I put the DeepSeek AI agent and Lindy through a series of tests to compare setup time, flexibility, costs, and more. If you've wanted to try DeepSeek, this guide will help you decide if it's right for you or not.
DeepSeek AI agent vs Lindy AI agent: What’s the difference?
DeepSeek is a developer-focused AI model platform that lets engineers build custom agents from the ground up, while Lindy is a no-code AI automation platform that helps teams deploy ready-to-use business agents that handle real workflows like calls, emails, and CRM updates.
Here’s how they compare in detail:
DeepSeek gives developers freedom to experiment with complex model behaviors. Lindy helps teams launch AI agents faster with built-in integrations.
DeepSeek AI agent: Features and highlights
DeepSeek is an AI platform that appeals to developers who want control over how their agents reason, plan, and act. It provides large language models, APIs, and tools that you can use to build autonomous systems from scratch.
The platform’s latest release, DeepSeek-V3.2, focuses on advanced reasoning and faster inference speeds. You can access it through the DeepSeek Open Platform or the mobile app, which acts as a testing ground for model outputs before connecting them to real workflows.
DeepSeek’s models can generate text, process documents, and integrate with APIs, giving you the flexibility to design your own agent logic.
Unlike AI agent platforms that provide no-code workflows, DeepSeek doesn’t offer a visual builder or pre-built automation templates. Teams need to configure tool-calling, retrieval systems, and hosting environments themselves.
This setup suits organizations that prefer to own their infrastructure and train agents for custom reasoning tasks.
Next, let’s see how Lindy does things differently.
Lindy AI agent: Features and highlights
Lindy lets you create and deploy AI agents that manage business workflows without writing code. You don’t need developers, as it lets you describe what you want the agent to do and then configure actions through a simple visual interface.
You can create AI workflows for tasks across domains like calling, customer support and follow-ups, lead generation, and CRM updates.
Lindy lets you configure and customize the agents to send emails, make or receive calls, manage calendars, or share updates in Slack without custom code. It’s also SOC 2 and HIPAA compliant, and works within regulated industries.
Lindy also integrates with 4,000+ business tools, so teams can connect their agents directly to the systems they already use. You also get pre-built AI agent templates for common workflows that shorten the deployment time.
Lindy’s ease of use makes it ideal for small and mid-sized businesses that want to do more using automation without technical setup or hiring more people.
{{templates}}
DeepSeek vs Lindy: Feature-by-feature comparison
Now that we’ve covered how both platforms work, let’s look at how DeepSeek and Lindy compare across the areas that matter most to teams evaluating AI agents.
Ease of use
DeepSeek and Lindy take very different approaches to usability. DeepSeek gives developers full control but demands a technical setup. Accessing its API and connecting it to workflows requires coding, hosting, and integration with external tools.
Its mobile app helps test model responses, but doesn’t let teams deploy production-ready agents. It works for organizations with in-house engineering or machine learning teams that prefer to build everything custom.
Lindy is simple to use and lets teams create agents and design workflows without writing code. Users can link multiple tools, define triggers, and set rules directly inside the builder. Its AI agent templates make it easy to launch common automations like lead routing or call follow-ups.
Lindy focuses on ease of use for non-technical users who want a shorter learning curve. DeepSeek suits developers who value customization over convenience.
Customization and flexibility
Customization determines how much control users have over agent behavior. DeepSeek offers maximum flexibility through its open API. Developers can build their own frameworks, integrate custom data sources, and define how agents interact with other tools.
It lets teams experiment with different architectures, fine-tune models, and control every decision-making step. However, it also means extra development effort and maintenance.
Lindy doesn’t offer that level of customization, but it’s easy to configure for non-technical teams. The no-code builder allows users to set conditions, actions, and approval steps inside a visual interface. It covers most business tasks like lead generation, data routing, or CRM syncs without added complexity.
When it comes to customizations, it’s a tie. DeepSeek is better for technical customization, while Lindy offers more flexibility for teams that want control through visual configuration.
Automation and workflow integration
DeepSeek’s API lets developers connect the model to any system, but they must build the automation logic themselves. There’s no native workflow dashboard, which makes setup longer for non-technical teams.
Lindy, on the other hand, connects with 4,000+ business apps, and lets you automate tasks like call handling, meeting scheduling, CRM updates, and Slack notifications with ease. You can combine multiple actions into a single workflow and reuse them across departments.
Lindy offers better out-of-the-box automation and integrations. DeepSeek is a better fit when teams want to design their own systems using APIs.
Pricing and scalability
There’s a DeepSeek AI free chat app. However, you need to pay for the API based on your usage. Here’s a breakdown:
- $0.028 for 1M input tokens (CACHE HIT)
- $0.28 for 1M input tokens (CACHE MISS)
- $0.42 for 1M output tokens
This can make budgeting harder for large-scale deployments with unpredictable usage spikes.
Lindy provides clear plan-based pricing with free credits to start. Here’s what each plan costs:
- Free: $0, up to 40 tasks/month
- Pro: $49.99/month, up to 1,500 monthly tasks
- Business: $199.99/month, 20,000 credits
- Enterprise: Custom pricing and limits
Lindy offers transparent and predictable pricing that’s easier to scale for SMBs. DeepSeek may be more cost-efficient for developers optimizing model usage internally.
Real-world use cases
DeepSeek is mainly used by developers building research tools, data analysis agents, or custom assistants. Tutorials on building agents with DeepSeek models show how teams combine APIs, memory systems, and reasoning pipelines to achieve agentic behavior.
Lindy lets non-technical teams create AI agents for tedious and repetitive tasks like answering calls, responding to emails, and following up across sales and customer support.
Pick Lindy for repeatable, everyday business use cases. DeepSeek works well for experimentation and model-level research.
What users have to say
Reviews highlight how each tool performs in real workflows and where it can improve. Here’s the consensus about each tool on the internet:
DeepSeek
- Pros
- Users who have tried the DeepSeek app on Google Play and third-party sites highlight its fast responses and strong technical performance.
- AppPicker’s review calls it lightning fast with impressive reasoning capabilities and praises its technical prowess for developers.
- Developers also appreciate having API access to test and build custom workflows.
- Cons
- Some users mention reliability and accuracy issues. On Trustpilot, reviewers describe mixed results and say that it’s impressive at times but not always accurate or helpful.
- Others note a lack of ready-made automation and transparent pricing compared to newer AI agent platforms.
Lindy
- Pros
- Lindy users consistently highlight easy setup and dependable support. A Trustpilot reviewer wrote that the AI agents are easy to build, reliable, and deliver business value.
- G2 reviewers agree with this. One reviewer stated that each agent he’s built was straightforward to implement and integrate with the existing systems.
- Cons
- Some users mention that large-scale automations may require higher-tier plans, depending on call or task volumes.
Next, let’s look at how teams can decide which AI agent fits their specific goals and technical setup.
How to choose the right agent
Choosing between DeepSeek and Lindy depends on your team’s skills and goals.
If you have in-house developers and prefer to build your own workflows, DeepSeek is ideal for you with its API and open model access. It suits teams that want to experiment, customize, or manage their infrastructure directly.
If you need to deploy AI agents for different tasks quickly and without writing code, Lindy is better. Its drag-and-drop workflow builder, 4,000+ integrations, and ready-to-use templates make it easy for non-technical users to automate tasks.
Let’s explore in detail what applications or use cases suit each tool.
DeepSeek AI Agent is better for
DeepSeek works best for teams that have in-house technical teams. Developers can use its models and API to design custom agents for niche tasks. It fits startups or enterprises that want control over how their agents process data, call tools, and reason through complex workflows.
Companies that already run internal systems or want to integrate AI into existing infrastructure can use DeepSeek to build custom assistants for research, analytics, or document processing. This setup requires time and engineering effort but gives complete ownership of how the agent behaves.
Lindy AI Agent is better for
Lindy suits teams that want automation without technical setup. It helps operations, sales, and customer support teams deploy agents that manage phone calls, emails, or CRM updates using a simple visual builder.
Its library of AI agent templates shows ready workflows that businesses can adapt quickly. Lindy works best for small and mid-sized companies that need easy automation, like faster lead follow-ups or quicker customer replies, without writing code.
My verdict
DeepSeek gives developers complete control to build advanced agents through custom code and APIs. It’s flexible but needs technical setup and maintenance. Lindy focuses on no-code, easy-to-deploy AI automation. It helps non-technical users create AI agents that handle calls, emails, and CRM workflows with minimal setup.
Lindy is better if you prefer speed of deployment, ease of use, and quick return on investment. If you prefer deep technical control, DeepSeek is the right choice.
{{cta}}
Try Lindy, a no-code DeepSeek alternative
Lindy beats DeepSeek because it lets you create custom AI agents without writing code. You can use these agents to automate tasks across emails, phone calls, meetings, and sales.
Here’s why Lindy suits non-technical teams:
- Drag-and-drop workflow builder for non-coders: You don’t need any technical skills to build workflows with Lindy. It offers a drag-and-drop visual workflow builder.
- Create AI agents for your use cases: You can give them instructions in everyday language and automate repetitive tasks. For instance, create an assistant to find leads from websites and sources like People Data Labs. Create another agent that sends emails to each lead and schedules meetings with members of your sales team.
- Free to start, affordable to scale: Build your first few automations with Lindy’s free version and get up to 40 tasks. With the Pro plan, you can automate up to 1,500 tasks, which offers much more value than Lindy’s competitors.
Frequently asked questions
What is DeepSeek AI used for?
Technical teams use DeepSeek AI and its API and model framework to build and run AI workflows that handle reasoning, problem-solving, and chat.
How does Lindy differ from DeepSeek?
Lindy lets you create AI agents without writing code. DeepSeek, on the other hand, provides models and APIs for developers. Lindy works well for non-technical teams as it gives them AI-powered workflows to handle everyday operations like calls, CRM updates, and follow-ups.
Is DeepSeek better for developers or businesses?
DeepSeek is better for developers or technical teams that want complete control over how their agents think and act. It’s not ideal for non-technical users or small businesses that need easy-to-use automation.
Which is easier to use: DeepSeek or Lindy?
Lindy is easier to use because it has a visual builder and prebuilt AI agent templates. DeepSeek requires coding and manual integration work.
Can Lindy integrate with DeepSeek or other AI models?
No, Lindy doesn’t directly integrate with DeepSeek. However, it supports Claude, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini models for its AI agents. You can choose from any of these models while creating your workflow. Lindy also integrates with 4,000+ business apps and tools.
Does DeepSeek have an AI agent?
DeepSeek doesn’t offer pre-built AI agents for end-users. Instead, it provides advanced models and APIs, such as DeepSeek-Reasoner, for developers to build custom AI agents that can handle multi-step tasks, advanced reasoning, and adaptive responses.
Does DeepSeek get detected by AI?
Like most large language model outputs, text generated by DeepSeek can sometimes be detected by AI-detection tools, depending on the content and sophistication of the detector.
Editing and customization may help reduce detectability, but there’s no way to not get detected entirely.
Can DeepSeek do AI images?
No, DeepSeek cannot do AI images. As of now, it only offers text and reasoning models. There’s no information on image-generation features on its official site.
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
