Devin AI pricing ranges from the $20/month Core plan. It suits small teams who need to integrate with Jira and Linear. Teams requiring API access will need to pay for the (steep) $500/month Teams Plan.
However, the Teams Plan offers more compute power than the Core plan, making it suitable for companies with significant and complex automation needs.
Our guide will cover:
- Each pricing plan’s features, pros, cons, and ideal users
- How to choose the right pricing plan for your needs
- Who should and shouldn’t use Devin
- A glance at some Devin alternatives
- A no-code AI agent builder for executing non-technical business workflows that you can pair with Devin
Devin pricing plans: At a glance
Devin AI offers 3 pricing plans. The platform offers a pricing plan for freelancers, medium organizations, and enterprises. Here’s a quick TL;DR:
Devin pricing plans
Devin offers a $20/month Core plan, a $500/month Team plan, and a custom-priced Enterprise plan.
Each plan includes a set number of Agent Compute Units (ACUs) that measure Devin’s work. ACUs reflect the complexity and duration of tasks like planning, debugging, context gathering, code execution, and browser actions.
Tasks do not consume ACUs equally. Longer workflows use more ACUs, while idle time uses none. For example, 1 ACU covers fixing a bug, building a small website, or restoring an old commit.
Core plan: Starts at $20/month
At $20/month, the Core plan lets developers try Devin without committing to a $500 subscription. This plan suits freelancers, individuals, and small teams with light, low-ACU tasks. The pay-as-you-go model fits users with limited workflows, offering additional ACUs at $2.25 each.
Key features
- Integrates with Jira and Linear: Devin integrates with Jira and Linear, letting developers connect tasks and track progress in their project tools. Integrations link bug fixes, feature updates, and coding sessions to project tickets automatically.
- Test code in a virtual machine: The platform runs code in an isolated environment separate from your device. This environment handles errors, bugs, or experimental builds and protects your device from crashes or data loss.
- Ability to provide API/Secret keys: The Core plan lets developers provide API and secret keys so Devin can access GitHub, cloud services, or third-party apps. This setup doesn’t use the Devin API, which is limited to Team and Enterprise plans. Core users cannot control Devin programmatically through an external API.
Best for
The Core plan fits individual developers or small teams who want to test Devin. It works best for smaller features, bug fixes, or limited projects. Developers building AI-assisted prototypes in GitHub or project tools also benefit from the Core plan.
Pros
- Flexible pay-as-you-go structure: The Core plan’s pay-as-you-go model lets developers control spending while experimenting. Users can buy ACUs as needed to test Devin on live projects, measure output, and evaluate performance without a large monthly fee.
- Lower entry price point: At $20 per month, the Core plan gives freelancers, individuals, and small teams an affordable way to start using Devin. It lowers financial risk while still offering core functionality.
Cons:
- Limited ACUs can run out: Because the Core plan relies on purchased ACUs, developers risk running out of credits mid-task. When credits expire, work pauses until developers buy more ACUs. This stop-and-go process disrupts workflows, especially during long debugging or complex feature development.
Team plan: $500/month
At $500 per month, the Team Plan targets medium-sized companies needing an AI coding assistant for multiple projects. This subscription provides 250 Agent Compute Units (ACUs), and Devin sells Team Plan subscribers additional ACUs for $2 each.
Key features
- Multiple parallel sessions across repositories: Parallel sessions let teams work across multiple repositories or projects. This supports larger organizations with active codebases and keeps tasks moving without bottlenecks.
- Pull request creation, review, and iterative code updates: Teams receive structured output that aligns with workflows in GitHub or GitLab. Devin cuts repetitive cycles and boosts momentum in collaborative engineering projects.
- Access to the Devin API for workflow automation: Engineering teams get more control over how Devin fits into existing CI/CD systems. Through the API, teams can integrate Devin directly into their pipelines and automate repetitive workflows without manual oversight.
Pros
- Supports complex, large-scale projects: The Team Plan offers constant coding support across complex systems. With 250 ACUs each month and parallel sessions, it handles multiple layers of development at once.
- Predictable monthly subscription: Unlike pay-as-you-go credits, the Team Plan provides 250 ACUs each month. Engineering managers can predict Devin’s resources monthly, avoid cost uncertainty, and keep coding workflows consistent.
Cons
- Higher upfront cost: The price can be prohibitive for lean or scaling teams with thin margins. Organizations must use the plan consistently to justify the higher cost.
Best for
The Team Plan suits medium-sized companies or growing organizations that need an AI coding assistant for multiple projects. It works best for teams managing active repositories, frequent pull requests, and iterative updates.
Enterprise plan: Custom pricing
The Enterprise plan offers a custom pricing model for large organizations that require advanced deployment, security, and scalability. Companies can choose SaaS for rapid setup or VPC (Virtual Private Cloud) for complete data isolation and compliance.
Key features
- Hybrid deployment options: The Enterprise Plan lets organizations deploy Devin via SaaS for speed or in a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) for security.
- Strong security and authentication features: Devin Enterprise integrates with SSO providers like Okta and Azure AD to secure authentication. This gives IT teams centralized credential control while letting developers use Devin in enterprise workflows.
- Scalability for large-scale migrations and refactors: The Enterprise plan supports parallel execution of thousands of repetitive tasks, such as large-scale code migrations. Clients use this plan to refactor millions of lines of code, which accelerates productivity and cuts costs.
Pros
- Supports large-scale engineering projects: The Enterprise Plan supports parallel execution of thousands of tasks, such as large-scale code migrations. Clients use it to refactor millions of lines of code, accelerating productivity and cutting costs.
- Security controls: Enterprises get compliance support through VPC deployment, session isolation, and secure communication channels. With VPC deployment, data stays inside the company’s own managed infrastructure, helping improve security and compliance.
Cons
- Higher deployment complexity: Unlike SaaS, which is nearly instant, VPC setups require IT resources, network configuration, and maintenance. Enterprises must commit engineering resources for deployment and monitoring, slowing time-to-value compared to smaller plans.
Best for
The Enterprise Plan suits large organizations with strict compliance needs, complex multi-repository projects, and major migration or refactoring. It fits enterprises that parallelize development across thousands of tasks while maintaining security and control.
Which Devin plan should you choose?
The Devin plan you should choose depends on your organization’s size. Here are the plans to consider:
Choose the Core plan if:
You’re an individual or small team that needs to automate lightweight tasks like bug fixes, small features, or AI-assisted prototypes. Keep in mind that Core plan users face limits, since ACUs can run out if too many tasks are executed.
Choose the Team Plan if:
The Teams Plan fits medium-sized companies or scaling organizations managing multiple repositories, frequent pull requests, and collaborative projects. It suits teams needing predictable monthly ACUs and multiple sessions. Teams needing parallel session support and pull request creation or reviews also benefit from the Teams Plan.
Choose the Enterprise Plan if:
The Enterprise Plan fits large companies with compliance needs, complex multi-repository systems, or major refactoring projects. It suits organizations requiring secure deployment and advanced scalability.
Is Devin worth the cost?
Devin is worth the cost for individual developers and engineering teams seeking automated code support. Teams with limited human resources that need to execute junior developers' tasks, like debugging, will find the platform valuable.
By completing these structured, scoped tasks, you free up time for your developers to focus on programming.
Seek Devin alternatives if:
You aren’t a developer, or you’re a beginner programmer who can’t define tasks like repo setup or dependency changes. Budget-conscious teams needing more tasks than the Core plan allows should consider a lower-cost Devin alternative.
Devin alternatives and pricing comparison
{{templates}}
Lindy vs Devin: Which should you choose?
Lindy handles operations and workflow automation without coding, while Devin focuses on programming and debugging. Some teams use both, splitting business automation and engineering tasks to maximize company productivity.
- Lindy is better for: Non-technical users exploring AI automation and teams that want AI assistants without coding. It helps professionals offload sales email writing, research tasks, and meeting note-taking. Lindy makes AI adoption accessible for everyday business tasks.
- Devin is better for: Engineers, technical teams, and programmers needing an AI coding assistant for programming and software development. Developers use it to write backend features, debug production issues, and build user interfaces. Engineering teams gain parallel support across repositories.
- Use both if: You want an automation software tool for business workflows and the ability to handle backend processes. Use Lindy for automating scheduling, reporting, and sales prep. Devin handles engineering tasks like routing bug fixes and web UI updates.
Lindy and Devin tackle different challenges but complement each other well. Lindy handles operations for business users, while Devin accelerates technical development for engineering teams.
By using both, teams can speed execution across business and product work. This combination benefits software production teams that need Devin for product fixes and Lindy for sales and outreach workflows.
{{cta}}
Final verdict: What value does Devin’s pricing bring?
Devin’s value depends on how teams consume ACUs and the coding tasks they assign. Each ACU covers actions like planning, debugging, or code execution, so pricing translates into real development time.
Heavy use drains ACUs quickly, limiting teams with complex projects. Developers must scope tasks clearly because ACUs always limit capacity.
Seeking a Devin alternative or complement? Try Lindy
Check out the Devin pricing plans and decide you’d like to give it a shot, but also need an agent-building platform that handles business tasks? Go with Lindy. You can build AI agents for executing business workflows like scheduling, email response, and lead qualification.
Here are some of Lindy’s core capabilities:
- No-code workflow builder: Lindy lets you build automations without coding skills. Its drag-and-drop interface makes it simple to design and launch workflows visually.
- Custom AI agents: You can create agents that respond to plain English instructions and handle specialized tasks. One agent can source leads from websites and People Data Labs, while another can send personalized emails and schedule meetings for your sales team.
- Affordable pricing: Lindy’s free plan supports 40 tasks to start. The Pro plan increases the limit to 1,500 tasks, delivering stronger value compared to competing automation tools.
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
