After testing n8n alongside popular automation platforms, I’ve compiled ten options that outperform it in setup time, AI capability, and day-to-day usability. Read my detailed reviews and learn why they are worth considering in 2025.
Top 10 n8n alternatives: At a glance
Let’s now explore these tools in detail and why they’re better than n8n.
1. Lindy: Best overall automation tool
Lindy is a no-code automation platform that lets you build AI agents to handle repetitive work. These agents can schedule meetings, reply to emails, update CRMs, or manage customer requests without any coding.
I tested Lindy to see how easily a non-technical team could create automations. The setup took a few minutes, and I could launch my first workflow faster than any other tool I tried.
Why it beats n8n
- Lindy lets users build workflows with natural language instead of complex nodes or scripts.
- The drag-and-drop builder connects tools without writing code, which removes most manual setup steps.
- It includes native AI features that simplify decision-making across workflows.
- The platform meets SOC 2 and HIPAA standards, so businesses can automate securely.
- All workflow templates in Lindy are free, while n8n provides free community templates but may charge for advanced features or managed hosting.
Pros
- Easy setup that cuts automation time
- Prebuilt agents for sales, support, and recruiting tasks
- Human-in-the-loop control for sensitive workflows
- 4,000+ integrations, including everyday business tools like Gmail, Notion, Airtable and more
Cons
- Limited flexibility for advanced developers who want custom code
- Works best for users who prefer guided no-code workflows
Pricing
- Free plan with up to 40 tasks/month
- Paid plans from $49.99/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Lindy suits teams that want quick, reliable automation without technical complexity. It combines AI agents for workflows with strong security and no-code simplicity in one easy-to-use tool.
{{templates}}
2. Node-RED: A free option for techies
Node-RED is an open-source automation tool built on Node.js. It helps developers create and connect workflows using a visual interface. You can combine APIs, databases, and hardware devices to build event-driven applications that respond in real time.
I tested Node-RED to see how well it supports developers who prefer flexibility. The tool performed smoothly once configured, but it requires a good understanding of JavaScript and network logic to use effectively.
Why it beats n8n
- Node-RED supports hardware integrations like Raspberry Pi and Arduino, which n8n does not.
- Developers can write custom JavaScript functions directly inside the workflow.
- It provides a vast library of prebuilt nodes for API orchestration, IoT devices, and data routing.
- The open-source community actively maintains and expands Node-RED’s capabilities.
Pros
- Free and fully open-source
- Extensive library of ready-to-use nodes
- Strong developer community and documentation
Cons
- Requires programming knowledge to build and debug flows
- The interface may feel complex for non-technical users
Pricing
- Free under the OpenJS Foundation license
Bottom line
Node-RED is for developers who want full control over their automations. It gives experienced users flexibility, scalability, and open access to build advanced workflows from the ground up.
3. Huginn: Great for developers who love GitHub
Huginn is an open-source platform that lets developers build automation agents to track, collect, and act on data. It works like a self-hosted version of IFTTT or Zapier, giving you complete control over how events trigger specific actions.
I tested Huginn to see how it performs for tech-savvy teams. The setup required coding knowledge, but once configured, Huginn handled complex event detection across multiple data sources with ease.
Why it beats n8n
- It connects to RSS feeds, APIs, and custom web scrapers without external integrations.
- Developers can modify the source code to fit unique automation needs.
- The community frequently updates Huginn with new features and agent types.
Pros
- Complete flexibility for developers who like self-hosted tools
- Strong GitHub community with active contributors
- Full control over data and workflow design
Cons
- Requires Ruby on Rails experience for customization
- Lacks built-in AI or no-code workflow support
Pricing
- Free under the MIT License
Bottom line
Huginn is ideal for developers who want control over their automations. It rewards technical users with deep customization options and a strong open-source community that keeps improving the platform.
4. Directus: For intelligent content management
Directus is an open-source data platform that turns any SQL database into a user-friendly content management system. It helps teams organize, edit, and share structured data through a clean interface and a powerful API layer.
I tested Directus to see how well it handles large datasets. The platform made it easy to connect my database, manage schema changes, and access content through a built-in API without writing custom backend code.
Why it beats n8n
- Directus automatically converts SQL databases into REST APIs, removing the need for repetitive backend coding.
- The interface supports collaboration and version control across teams.
- Users can manage permissions, roles, and data workflows from a single dashboard.
- Directus offers better multi-user support than n8n, which focuses on individual developers.
Pros
- Intuitive interface for managing structured data
- Real-time collaboration features for teams
- Flexible enough for both technical and non-technical users
Cons
- Works best for teams familiar with SQL
- Requires setup and database knowledge for advanced use cases
Pricing
- Free open-source version with unlimited users
- Paid plans from $15/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Directus is a strong option for teams that manage large amounts of structured data. It combines the flexibility of a database with the ease of a CMS, making data management more accessible to both developers and business users.
5. Zapier: Best for simple, non-technical automation
Zapier is a no-code automation platform that connects thousands of apps and helps users automate everyday tasks. It allows teams to create workflows called “Zaps” that trigger actions across tools like Gmail, Slack, HubSpot, and Google Sheets.
I tested Zapier to see how easily a non-technical user can get started. The setup was quick, and most automations worked right away without any technical input. It’s the simplest option for teams that want reliable results with minimal effort.
Why it beats n8n
- Zapier offers over 8,000 integrations that connect apps instantly without coding.
- Users can create multi-step workflows with prebuilt triggers and actions.
- The interface is intuitive and easy for beginners to understand.
Pros
- Simple setup and intuitive interface
- Huge integration library with strong third-party app support
- Reliable automation performance
Cons
- Can get expensive at higher automation volumes
- Limited flexibility for developers who need custom control
Pricing
- Free tier with up to 100 tasks per month
- Paid plans from $29.99/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Zapier is the best choice for teams that want plug-and-play automation without coding. It saves time, connects popular tools easily, and works smoothly for non-technical users.
6. Gumloop: For simple workflows
Gumloop is a no-code automation platform that helps users create and manage simple AI workflows. It connects popular tools like Slack, Salesforce, and Google Workspace, allowing teams to automate tasks across multiple platforms through a drag-and-drop interface.
I tested Gumloop to see how quickly I could build workflows from scratch. The platform’s layout felt intuitive, and setting up basic automations took less than ten minutes. It’s a good fit for small teams that want to get started with automation fast.
Why it beats n8n
- Gumloop’s drag-and-drop builder makes workflow creation simple for non-technical users.
- The platform includes built-in integrations with major SaaS apps.
- It requires no external scripting or API setup to connect tools.
- Gumloop focuses on visual simplicity, while n8n caters more to developers.
Pros
- Beginner-friendly visual interface
- Smooth setup process that requires no coding
- Useful native integrations with common business apps
Cons
- Limited customization for complex workflows
- Higher monthly pricing than other entry-level tools
Pricing
- Free tier with 2,000 credits/month
- Paid plans from $37/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Gumloop is ideal for non-technical teams that want fast, visual automation without complex setup. It works best for small teams that prioritize simplicity over deep customization.
7. Make: For clean, visual automation workflows
Make is a visual automation platform that helps teams connect apps, organize data, and build workflows. It lets users design complex scenarios that move information across tools automatically, all within a clean visual editor.
I tested Make to see how well it handles detailed data tasks. The tool impressed me with its real-time data controls and ability to filter, map, and transform information during workflow execution.
Why it beats n8n
- Make gives users data manipulation options like filters, aggregators, and formula-based transformations.
- It supports real-time scenario updates without requiring code edits.
- The interface is more visual and easier to navigate than n8n’s node-based setup.
- It handles large-scale data workflows efficiently for both small and mid-sized teams.
Pros
- Excellent for managing complex data automations
- Intuitive visual interface for scenario building
- Real-time execution and debugging tools
Cons
- Comes with a learning curve for beginners
- Limited collaboration options in lower-tier plans
Pricing
- Free tier offers up to 1,000 monthly operations
- Paid plans from $10.59/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Make is best for teams that manage complex data workflows and want precise control over every automation step. It offers the flexibility of a low-code platform with the simplicity of visual design.
8. Latenode: For ultra-customizable low-code automation
Latenode is a low-code automation platform that combines visual workflow design with technical flexibility. It allows users to connect APIs, databases, and apps to create custom automations that fit their specific business logic.
I tested Latenode to see how well it balances no-code simplicity with developer control. The experience felt smooth, and the platform offered enough flexibility for both beginners and advanced users who want deeper customization.
Why it beats n8n
- Latenode combines drag-and-drop tools with optional scripting, which helps users build workflows faster.
- It includes an AI copilot that assists with code generation and workflow suggestions.
- Users can customize API calls and data handling directly within the interface.
- The platform gives more control over automation logic than n8n without demanding full coding knowledge.
Pros
- Combines visual design with low-code flexibility
- Helpful AI copilot for generating scripts
- Works well for teams with mixed technical skills
Cons
- Requires some programming knowledge for advanced functions
- Smaller integration library than larger automation platforms
Pricing
- Free tier with 300 scenarios/month
- Paid plans from $19/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Latenode is a smart choice for teams that want control without the complexity of full coding. It gives users the flexibility to design unique workflows while keeping the automation setup straightforward.
9. Pipedream: For technical teams working with APIs
Pipedream is a hybrid automation platform that mixes low-code and pro-code features. It helps developers connect APIs, databases, and cloud functions using programming languages like JavaScript, Python, Go, and Bash.
I tested Pipedream to understand how well it fits developers who prefer coding control. The platform handled scripts smoothly and made it easy to monitor executions through its built-in logging and debugging tools.
Why it beats n8n
- Pipedream lets developers write and run code directly inside workflows.
- It includes live execution previews and error tracking to simplify testing.
- The platform supports multiple coding languages and frameworks.
- It integrates with major APIs and serverless environments.
Pros
- Developer focus with flexible scripting options
- Real-time debugging and logging tools
- Reliable integrations for custom use cases
Cons
- Requires coding experience to use effectively
- Work only for technical users
Pricing
- Free tier with 100 credits/month
- Paid plans from $45/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Pipedream suits developers who want a coding-first automation platform. It delivers strong flexibility, advanced debugging, and smooth integration for building and running custom scripts at scale.
10. Airbyte: For automating data pipelines
Airbyte is an open-source data integration platform that helps teams move and sync data across multiple systems. It connects databases, SaaS tools, and cloud storage platforms to keep data consistent and updated in real time.
I tested Airbyte to see how well it supports data-driven teams. The setup felt technical but manageable, and the platform’s large connector library made it easy to sync data between tools without manual intervention.
Why it beats n8n
- Airbyte offers 300+ prebuilt connectors for databases and cloud services.
- It supports incremental data syncs that only transfer new or updated records.
- Users can self-host or use the managed cloud version based on their needs.
- The open-source community updates connectors frequently, ensuring reliability.
Pros
- Excellent connector coverage for most data sources
- Efficient incremental syncs that save time and bandwidth
- Flexible deployment options for cloud and on-prem environments
Cons
- Requires technical setup and database familiarity
- Limited built-in AI features
Pricing
- Open-source version available for self-hosting
- Paid plans from $10/month, billed monthly
Bottom line
Airbyte is the best choice for data teams that manage multiple pipelines and large datasets. It combines integrations with flexible hosting options, giving developers control over how their data moves.
Why I looked for n8n alternatives
n8n is an excellent workflow automation platform, but it often feels built for developers rather than everyday users. I wanted to find tools that offer similar power without the technical overhead.
When I tested n8n, I noticed that the setup required coding knowledge, Docker installation, and manual API configuration. It worked well once running, but creating and managing workflows took more effort than expected.
I started looking for alternatives that could launch faster, handle scaling automatically, and include built-in AI features. The goal was to find automation tools that save time for both technical and non-technical teams.
How I tested these alternatives
I tested each platform by building the same sample workflow. I wanted to capture form submissions, store data in a spreadsheet, and send an automated email response. This made it easier to compare setup time, reliability, and output quality.
I focused on four main factors during testing:
- Ease of use: How quickly a new user can build and launch workflows
- AI integration: Whether the platform includes built-in AI tools or native model support
- Scalability: How well the platform handles multiple tasks and growing data volumes
- Pricing fairness: Whether users get functionality without hidden fees or complex limits
I evaluated each tool for both performance and accessibility. My goal was to identify options that combine power, clarity, and simplicity for different levels of technical skill.
Which alternative should you choose?
You should choose the n8n alternative depending on how technical your team is and what you want to automate. Here are a few scenarios to help you decide:
Choose Lindy if:
- You want to build automations without writing code or managing APIs
- Your team needs AI agents that handle tasks like scheduling, follow-ups, or CRM updates
- You prefer a platform with built-in compliance, free templates, and fast setup
Choose another alternative
- Node-RED or Huginn: If you have developers who want control over their automation logic
- Directus: If you need to manage structured data or APIs within a flexible CMS
- Zapier or Gumloop: If you want a simple, visual automation tool with broad app support
- Make or Latenode: If you need advanced data workflows and analytics control
- Pipedream or Airbyte: If you want developer-grade scripting tools and API flexibility
Stick with n8n if:
- You already run complex workflows on a self-hosted setup and prefer to manage your own servers
- You have the technical skills to maintain and customize open-source code
My final verdict
After testing every tool, Lindy stands out as the best n8n alternative for most teams. It removes the technical barriers that slow people down and adds built-in AI to handle everyday workflows automatically.
Developers may prefer open-source tools like Node-RED or Huginn, but for anyone who wants fast setup, simple design, and secure automation, Lindy offers the best balance of power and ease.
If you need an automation platform that works out of the box, Lindy is the one to start with.
{{cta}}
Try Lindy, the no-code n8n alternative
Lindy is an automation tool that lets you create AI agents for tasks across emails, meetings, sales, and more.
Lindy stands out among n8n alternatives for three key reasons:
- Drag-and-drop workflow builder for non-coders: You don’t need any technical skills to build workflows with Lindy. It offers a drag-and-drop visual workflow builder.
- Create AI agents for your use cases: You can give them instructions in everyday language and automate repetitive tasks. For instance, create an assistant to find leads from websites and sources like People Data Labs. Create another agent that sends emails to each lead and schedules meetings with members of your sales team.
- Free to start, affordable to scale: Build your first few automations with Lindy’s free version and get up to 40 tasks. With the Pro plan, you can automate up to 1,500 tasks, which offers much more value than Lindy’s competitors.
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
