Marvin ran Google Calendar, Outlook, and Teamup among 13 shareable calendar apps through the same team setup, ranking them on sharing controls, booking, and scheduling automation.
.avif)

Getting a team to agree on when things happen is harder than the work itself. Someone books over a client call; a shared doc says one time and the invite says another, and half the group never sees the update because they live in a different calendar app than the rest.
A shareable calendar app fixes that by putting one schedule where everyone can see it, edit it, or subscribe to it. I spent two weeks comparing 13 of them against the same setup, running a mixed team on Google and Outlook through a packed week of meetings and a recurring schedule that kept changing on me.
Some share a calendar in two clicks. Others go further and let AI move things around when the week falls apart. Below is where each one belongs, what it costs once you're past the free tier, and who should skip it.
I set up the same shared schedule in all 13 apps. That meant a five-person team split across Google and Outlook, a week with 20-plus meetings, and a recurring standup that I kept moving to see what broke. I invited the same two teammates to each one and watched how fast an edit showed up on their end. Here's what I scored:
Two jobs kept pulling apart as I tested: sharing a calendar and running a team's whole schedule. Most apps here do one or the other, so each section below says which job it's for.
Prices reflect each vendor's listed starting paid tier and its own billing cadence. See each section for monthly-versus-yearly detail.

What it does: Google Calendar shares a full calendar, a single secondary calendar, or a public link, and lets you set a different permission level for each person you invite.
Best for: Teams where everyone already has a Google account and wants sharing that works the second the invite goes out.
Sharing took two clicks. I opened a secondary calendar named "Team Ops," added a teammate's Gmail, and picked their access level from four options. The event I created synced to their side in seconds, and the edit I made an hour later showed up before I'd switched tabs.
The control settings are the strong part. You can hand one person "see only free/busy," give another full edit rights, and publish a read-only link for everyone else, all from one settings panel. For a team that lives in Gmail, that covers the job without a second app.
Pros:
✅ Sharing a calendar with another Google user takes two clicks and syncs in seconds.
✅ Four permission levels control who sees details versus who can edit.
✅ Secondary calendars let you separate "Team Ops" from "Client Calls" and share each with a different group.
Cons:
❌ Sharing with Outlook or iCloud users is clunky and usually read-only through an .ics link.
❌ No task prioritization or AI planning. It shows the shared calendar and stops there.
❌ Family and household features are thin, so it suits work teams better than mixed personal groups.

"You can create a Google Meet link directly inside a Calendar invite, attach or pull a file from Drive straight into an email, and quickly find what you need using Google’s built-in search." — Harkeerat S., G2

"I know there are things. I have submitted requests for changes but at the moment I cannot think of many. I do wish the mobile version worked more closely to the way the web version works." — Christine L., G2
The first paid team tier is Business Starter at $8.40/user/month, which adds 30 GB pooled storage per user and 100-participant video meetings on top of the calendar. Business Standard runs $16.80/user/month.
For a team already on Gmail, this calendar stays out of the way and just works. For a team that lives in Gmail, nothing here shares a schedule with less friction.

What it does: Outlook Calendar shares calendars across a Microsoft 365 organization by default, with directory-wide free/busy visibility and delegation set at the admin level.
Best for: Companies already standardized on Microsoft 365, where scheduling happens inside the org, and IT controls access.
Inside a Microsoft 365 tenant, sharing barely needs setup. I saw colleagues' free/busy without asking, and the Scheduling Assistant found a slot for a group of five without the usual email thread. Delegation let me hand calendar control to an assistant account in a couple of clicks.
That depth cuts both ways. An enterprise gets everything it needs here, from permissions to resource booking to room calendars, but a five-person startup gets more software than the job calls for.
Pros:
✅ Org-wide free/busy visibility means no back-and-forth to see when a colleague is open.
✅ Scheduling Assistant handles the "find a time for seven people" problem cleanly.
✅ Resource booking covers rooms and equipment alongside people, at the org level.
Cons:
❌ Sharing with Gmail or iCloud users needs workarounds and usually loses write access.
❌ The interface is heavier than a small team needs for simple calendar sharing.

"The search feature is fast, folders and categories help keep my inbox organized, and the calendar integration makes it easy to manage meetings and appointments." — Abhishek S., G2

"There are occasional sync delays and performance issues, particularly after updates or when network connectivity is unstable." — Ameer A., G2
The entry business tier is Microsoft 365 Business Basic at $7/user/month (paid yearly), which covers the web and mobile Outlook calendar plus custom business email. Business Standard with Copilot runs $23.50 per user/month (paid yearly).
The calendar is installed and working the day your company adopts Microsoft 365, and that head start is the argument for it. A team not tied to Microsoft will carry more interfaces than it ever uses.

What it does: Teamup builds a shared calendar around access links, so contributors and viewers can see or edit a schedule without creating an account or logging in.
Best for: Clubs, sports teams, schools, and shift-based workplaces where the people checking the schedule don't all have Google or Microsoft accounts.
Teamup handles a case the mainstream apps ignore. I generated one link with edit rights and another read-only, sent them out, and both recipients opened the calendar without an account. For a volunteer roster or a sports club, that erases the biggest barrier to getting everyone on the same schedule.
The permissions go deeper than I expected. Nine access levels let me give one group add-events rights, another read-only, and a third free/busy alone, each through its own link to the same master calendar. That's the kind of control a shift manager needs.
Pros:
✅ Nobody needs an account to view or edit, which is rare and hugely useful for community groups.
✅ Nine permission levels give tight, per-link control over who does what.
✅ Works for shift rosters, clubs, and public schedules that don't fit a standard work calendar.
✅ Twelve calendar views, including a scheduler and timeline, cover almost any way a group wants to read the schedule.
Cons:
❌ It doesn't sync two-way with personal Google or Outlook calendars the way a native app does.
❌ The interface is built for function over polish and looks dated next to Google or Notion.
❌ Setup takes longer than a consumer app, since the flexibility comes with more to configure.

"We really enjoy using Teamup in our company. Everyone on the team is pleased with how it helps us manage appointments. In addition to work-related scheduling." — Tina W., G2

"I wish there was a way to 'block out' a day across all my calendars for holidays." —Tom L., G2
The first paid tier is Plus at $15/month (billed monthly, or $12/month billed yearly), which raises the limit to 12 sub-calendars and 12 users and adds the Daily Agenda email. Teamup prices per master calendar, not per seat. The Pro tier runs at $35/month, billed monthly.
When half your group would never bother creating an account, Teamup still gets them onto the schedule when no native calendar would.

What it does: Calendly shares your live availability as a booking link, so people outside your team pick an open slot and the meeting lands on both calendars automatically.
Best for: Teams that book a lot of meetings with clients, candidates, or partners and want to drop the back-and-forth of finding a time.
Calendly shares availability rather than a calendar, a different job from the others here. I connected my Google Calendar, set working hours, and sent a link. The other person booked a slot without seeing my full schedule, and the event showed up on both sides with a video link already attached.
The team routing lifts it past a personal tool. A booking request can rotate round-robin across a group or go to whoever's free first, which is exactly how sales and recruiting teams hand out meetings.
Pros:
✅ Lets anyone outside your team self-book an open slot with no email thread.
✅ Round-robin routing matches how sales and recruiting teams assign meetings in practice.
✅ Checks every connected calendar at once, so it avoids double-booking you.
Cons:
❌ It shares availability, not a team calendar, so it complements one rather than replacing it.
❌ The routing and integrations have a learning curve before a team runs them smoothly.

"I mostly use Calendly for interviews, quick client calls, and follow-ups, and honestly it makes scheduling a lot less annoying." — Kaleem A., G2

"Some workflows might not work as expected if we don't sync the secondary calendar. Calendly might show us as available when actually we are not." — Sasi B., G2
$20/seat/month on Teams, billed monthly, is the tier that adds round-robin meetings, lead routing, and Salesforce integration. Standard sits below it at $12/seat/month.
If the scheduling that hurts is booking with outsiders instead of coordinating internally, Calendly targets exactly that problem. Treat it as the layer that sits next to your shared calendar, not the one that replaces it.

What it does: You text Lindy and it works the calendar for you, finding a time, sending the invite, and rescheduling when plans move, then handles the inbox and follow-ups around it.
Best for: Teams and busy operators who'd rather hand calendar and admin work to an AI assistant than juggle it across separate apps.
With Lindy, you don't open a calendar at all. You message it in plain language and it acts. I asked it to find a time for a call and send the invite, and it did both without me touching my calendar. When I moved that meeting, it handled the reschedule and the heads-up to the other person on its own.
It connects to Gmail or Outlook, and you tell it how you want replies and scheduling to sound, so it matches your style instead of reading like a generic bot. Nothing goes out without your say-so, since it proposes and waits for approval before it sends.
Pros:
✅ You run scheduling from a text instead of clicking through a calendar interface.
✅ Meeting prep, notes, and follow-up run as one chain, so you never pick up the second half by hand.
✅ Approvals are built in, so Lindy proposes and drafts but won't send until you confirm.
Cons:
❌ It manages a schedule rather than displaying one for a group, so it's an assistant, not a shared calendar view.
❌ Early drafts read generic until you tell it how you want replies to sound.
❌ Multi-step requests take a couple of tries to phrase before they run cleanly.

"Lead Follow-Up & Booking: A dedicated Lindy agent follows up with leads, handles objections, and books appointments directly into my calendar." — Craig A., G2

"It can be tricky to understand why something isn't working." — Milo P., G2
Lindy's first paid tier is Plus at $49.99 per account/month, which includes standard usage, up to 2 connected inboxes, iMessage/SMS access, meeting scheduling, and 100-plus integrations. Pro runs $99.99 per account/month and Max $199.99 per account/month for heavier workloads. Pricing is per account rather than per seat.
When the drain is managing itself, when the calendar, the inbox, and the follow-ups eat your whole morning, Lindy lifts that off you from a text thread. It runs a schedule instead of showing one, so a group that just needs a shared view won't use half of it.
{{templates}}

What it does: Motion builds each person's day from their tasks, deadlines, and meetings, then reshuffles the whole schedule the moment something on a shared calendar changes.
Best for: Teams that would rather let AI decide when work happens than drag blocks around a calendar by hand.
Motion decides when each task lands. I gave it names, durations, and deadlines, and it placed them on the calendar for me. A meeting dropped into my afternoon mid-test, and the rest of the day was rebuilt around it before I could react. Six tasks moved, and I hadn't touched a thing.
For a team, dependency handling is the part worth paying for. When one person's step needed another's to finish first, Motion held off scheduling it until the blocker cleared, so a multi-stage project stayed in order without anyone sequencing it manually.
Pros:
✅ Rebuilds the whole day within seconds of a disruption, the fastest reaction I saw across the thirteen.
✅ Respects task dependencies, so downstream work waits until the blocking step is done.
✅ Turns a prompt into a full project timeline without manual sequencing.
Cons:
❌ Needs two to four weeks of daily use before the AI plans your time accurately.
❌ It's a planner first, so plain calendar sharing takes a back seat to scheduling automation.

"Motion has elevated my productivity to the max. I am able to enter tasks for different projects and have an organized and timely calendar to follow." — Sabrina A., G2

"I have a lot of family calendars that I use, and I think that I have figured out a way to use it how it is now, but it could be a little bit easier to find times to do things with the different calendars within Motion." — Rachael H., G2
The team tier is Business AI at $69/seat/month (billed monthly), which adds team capacity planning, dashboards, and access control on top of the AI planner.
Motion was built for the team whose hard part is deciding when work should happen, not remembering what's due. If you want manual control over your own calendar, you'll fight the adjustment period more than it helps you.

What it does: Reclaim.ai runs on top of Google Calendar or Outlook, defending focus time, scheduling recurring habits, and fitting tasks around the meetings already on a team's week.
Best for: Teams with packed calendars that keep losing deep work hours and want that time protected without anyone blocking it by hand.
Setup asked less of me than I expected. I connected Google Calendar, set a weekly focus goal, added two recurring habits, and within the hour those blocks were sitting on my week. Over the next few days, they rescheduled themselves whenever a meeting landed on top of them, instead of getting wiped out.
The analytics showed a big share of my week going to meetings I'd never counted, the sort of pattern a team lead can act on once a tool surfaces it. And because Reclaim layers onto the calendar the team already uses, none of that visibility asks anyone to change how they work.
Pros:
✅ Focus blocks reschedule themselves the moment a conflict lands, with no manual defending.
✅ Runs on top of your existing Google Calendar or Outlook, so there's no migration or workflow change.
✅ Habits find the next open slot when conflicts hit, keeping routines from dropping off.
Cons:
❌ No native mobile app, so Reclaim events are best edited through Google Calendar or Outlook on a phone.
❌ It layers on a calendar rather than being one, so it needs a Google or Outlook base underneath.
❌ The reporting shows where time goes but stops short of telling you what to change.

"Reclaim.ai keeps my calendar organized without requiring constant manual planning. I can add tasks, set priorities, and the platform automatically finds the best time for them around my meetings." — Muzammil M., G2

"Reclaim.ai is not allowed to work with the NHS.net calendar, which is frustrating and could benefit from negotiation." — Chris W., G2
The first paid tier is Starter at $12/seat/month (billed monthly), aimed at small teams and adding unlimited habits and up to 10 seats.
For a calendar that's already full, where the fight is finding time to do the work, Reclaim guards that time for you automatically. A team that needs task or project management bundled in will get more ground covered from Motion at a similar price.

What it does: Superhuman bundles mail, an AI layer called Go, a docs tool, and writing help into one suite, surfacing the right action across your apps before you ask for it.
Best for: Teams that bounce between several tools daily and want scheduling and follow-ups handled without switching windows first.
Go earned its keep in the inbox. It caught a scheduling request buried in a Slack thread before I'd opened my calendar, offered three open times, and booked the meeting the second I confirmed one. It acted on its own instead of waiting for a prompt, the way a chat window would.
That same speed showed up in the everyday replies. Drafts in my tone landed fast enough that most needed only a glance before sending, and follow-ups I'd normally forget got flagged once a thread stalled. For a team spread across apps, the value is that context follows you between them.
Pros:
✅ Go surfaces the right action inside whatever app you're in, with no tab switching.
✅ Mail drafts land close enough to your tone that they need only a quick read.
✅ Superhuman Docs links your stack into one queryable knowledge base for the team.
Cons:
❌ The payoff depends on using several tools in the suite together, so an email-only user sees a fraction of it.
❌ Scheduling through Go needs a live connection to your calendar and inbox, so setup takes more upfront work.

"All of the seamless integrations that allow me to work from ONE window! I can setup calendar meetings, share availability, set reminders for myself, as well as reply to emails, drafts, etc all in the same place." — Abby B., G2

"The screen size makes it impossible to read some things that I have to switch to Outlook in order to read." — Bring K., G2
The team tier is Business at $40/member/month (billed monthly), which covers Mail, AI triage, and the full Go, Superhuman Docs, and Grammarly suite.
Superhuman paid off most when I worked across a stack of connected apps, which is exactly the team it suits. Anyone who only needs faster email won't get enough from the inbox alone to justify the full suite.

What it does: Notion Calendar ties your schedule to the pages and databases your team already works in, so events, tasks, and docs sit in one connected workspace.
Best for: Teams that already run their projects, notes, and tasks inside Notion and want the calendar in the same place.
The calendar links straight to the work behind it. I linked a project database to a calendar view, and every task with a due date showed up on the schedule. Change the date on the calendar and the database updates, so the team sees one source of truth instead of a calendar and a task list drifting apart.
The Notion Agent went a step further. I asked it to build a project tracker from a rough outline, and it created the database, filled the properties, and linked related pages without me starting from a template. For a team already living in Notion, the schedule becomes one more view of work that's there.
Pros:
✅ The calendar and the underlying work stay in sync, so a date change updates both at once.
✅ The Notion Agent builds and edits trackers on its own, going past answering questions about them.
✅ For a team already in Notion, the schedule adds no new app to learn.
Cons:
❌ The value scales with how much of your work already lives in Notion. A team outside it gets little.
❌ The full AI, including the Agent, sits on the Business tier, so smaller teams only get a limited trial.
❌ It leans toward internal workspace scheduling over sharing a calendar with outside people.

"The calendar feature is great for automatically updating my calendar and sending notifications before meetings, which definitely helps me stay organized." — Neeraj J., G2

"I haven't been able to get my daily habit tracker to integrate with my calendar as well as I would have liked. As such, I spent some time setting it up but never really stuck to using it." — Courtney K., G2
The Plus plan runs at $12/member/month, billed monthly. Full AI, including the Notion Agent, sits on the Business tier, so Plus gets only a limited AI trial.
The more of your team's work already sits in Notion, the more the calendar pays off as one connected view. Run your work outside Notion and the setup cost outweighs what the calendar gives back.

What it does: Doodle runs group polls that collect everyone's availability, then lands on the time that works for the widest group without a single reply-all thread.
Best for: Teams and groups trying to pin down one meeting time across a lot of busy, scattered calendars.
Doodle strips group scheduling down to a single poll. I proposed five time options, sent the poll link, and watched the group mark what worked. The slot with the most overlap rose to the top, and the meeting went out to everyone without anyone comparing calendars one by one.
Beyond polls, the booking pages cover recurring 1:1s, and the paid tiers connect to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Webex so the video link attaches itself. For a team that mostly struggles with the "when can everyone meet" question, that's the one problem it clears.
Pros:
✅ Solves group scheduling faster than any thread of reply-all emails.
✅ Booking pages and polls cover both one-off meetings and recurring 1:1s.
✅ Video links attach on their own once Zoom, Teams, or Webex is connected.
Cons:
❌ It finds a time rather than holding a shared calendar, so it won't display an ongoing team schedule.
❌ The most useful integrations and booking features sit behind the paid tiers.

"Like most survey respondents, I have never missed a deadline for scheduling a meeting or received a late response." — Jordan T., G2

"The free version feels quite limited once you start using it regularly for professional scheduling." — Yuna P., G2
$20/month for 2 seats on the Team plan is the tier that adds an admin console, roles and permissions, and book-on-behalf. Doodle prices Team plan by seat count, not per individual seat.
When the only headache is agreeing on a time across a crowd of busy calendars, Doodle removes it with a poll and moves on. It finds a time and stops there, so it won't hold the schedule once the meeting's set.

What it does: ClickUp puts tasks, docs, and a calendar in one workspace, so scheduled work syncs to a calendar view and its AI reads the whole board as it changes.
Best for: Teams already running projects in ClickUp that want the schedule woven into task tracking rather than kept in a separate app.
ClickUp's calendar sits on top of the work. I set due dates on a board of active tasks, and they populated a shared calendar the whole team could see, each one still linked to its task. Move a task on the calendar and its deadline updates everywhere, so the schedule and the project stay in step.
The AI, Brain, reads that live data. I asked for a standup summary and it pulled the blockers and overdue items straight from the board rather than anything I typed. On a messy board, the summary got vague, which said more about the workspace than the assistant, but on a clean one, it was sharp.
Pros:
✅ The calendar stays tied to live tasks, so a date change updates the schedule and the project at once.
✅ Brain pulls standup summaries straight from workspace data instead of a generic guess.
✅ One subscription covers GPT, Claude, and Gemini, so there's no separate AI account to manage.
✅ Persistent memory carries your team's working style forward across projects.
Cons:
❌ Messy or loosely structured boards produce vague AI summaries, so output rides on workspace hygiene.
❌ The calendar is one feature inside a big platform, so a team wanting a simple shared calendar gets far more than that.
❌ Starting from zero, the setup overhead outweighs the payoff until the workspace fills in.

"I have a calendar just for social media and am able to keep track of what I post on each platform along with task lists, and my marketing calendar which I can easily share with others." — Tracy N., G2

"The integration with Google Calendar doesn't always work well, and I end up using Google Calendar directly, so improving this integration would be good." — Ariadne A., G2
The first paid tier is Unlimited at $10/user/month (billed monthly, or $7 per user/month billed yearly), which adds unlimited integrations, dashboards, and storage.
Teams already living inside ClickUp get the fastest return here, since the calendar plugs into work that's already underway. Want nothing but a shared calendar? The rest of ClickUp will feel like overkill.

What it does: TimeTree gives each group its own shared calendar, and every event carries a comment thread so a couple, family, or small group coordinates plans inside the calendar itself.
Best for: Couples and small groups who want a clean shared calendar with a conversation attached to every event.
TimeTree treats the calendar as a group chat with dates. I created a shared calendar, sent an invite, and the other person joined from the link with no account to set up. Each event opened its own comment thread, so the back-and-forth about a dinner plan stayed on the event where everyone could see it.
It works as its own app rather than a layer on top of Google or Outlook. That keeps it simple for a couple, since there's nothing to connect and no settings to learn, but it also means a work calendar can't flow in, so TimeTree stays a place for personal plans.
Pros:
✅ Per-event chat keeps plan coordination on the event instead of in a separate text thread.
✅ Anyone can join with a link, with no Google or Microsoft account required.
✅ Runs the same on iOS and Android, so a mixed-phone couple stays in sync.
Cons:
❌ It's a standalone app with no two-way sync to a work Google or Outlook calendar.
❌ Made for couples and small groups, so it doesn't scale to team scheduling or permissions.

"I love this application. I've created several groups: my little family, the big family, and a group of friends with whom we organize sporting activities." — Nguessan Valery Y., Capterra

"I think there are sometimes advertisements that can make it glitch, but I have never felt strongly about a con with the application." — Madison M., Capterra
TimeTree is free to use with a shared calendar and per-event chat. Premium runs $4.49/month (or $44.99 for 12 months) and adds an ad-free experience, file attachments, a vertical multi-day view, and the option to pin key events.
For two people or a small group who mostly need to see and talk about the same plans, TimeTree covers it with a shared calendar and a chat on every event, and nothing heavier gets in the way.

What it does: Cozi is a family organizer centered on a color-coded shared calendar, with shared shopping lists, to-dos, and a meal planner sitting alongside it under one family account.
Best for: Families coordinating kids' activities and appointments who want the calendar and the grocery list in the same place.
Cozi keeps a family's calendar and shared lists in one app. Every family member gets a color, so one glance shows who's where. I added an appointment and it notified the whole family right away, and the shared shopping list updated live as anyone checked things off from their own phone.
The calendar sits next to a meal planner and to-do lists, and that pairing is the point, since the grocery list and the week's dinners live in the same app as the schedule. It doesn't connect to Google Workspace or Outlook, so work meetings stay elsewhere.
Pros:
✅ Every feature centers on household logistics, from groceries to kids' activities.
✅ Works on iOS, Android, and web, so an iPhone-and-Android household stays in sync.
✅ The free version includes the shared calendar, lists, and recipes with no paywall.
Cons:
❌ It doesn't integrate with Google Workspace or Outlook, so work calendars stay separate.
❌ No time-blocking, permissions, or professional scheduling. It covers home logistics and stops there.
❌ The month view and ad-free experience sit behind the paid tier.

"The Cozi app is brilliant! Perfectly syncs with our calendar and as a family. Easy to add to shopping and to-do lists and check off." — Krissy Quinton, Trustpilot

"It doesn't work at all on children's mobiles, and we have real problems using it. I regret buying it because I forgot to quit it yesterday or before." —Claudia R., Trustpilot
Cozi is free with a shared calendar, lists, and recipes. Cozi Gold runs $39/year and adds an ad-free experience, a month view, more reminders, and a birthday tracker. Cozi Max runs $79/year and adds AI tools that turn emails into calendar events and generate meal plans.
When a busy household's week is packed with school pickups and appointments, Cozi keeps the whole thing on one shared calendar.
The right shareable calendar app comes down to who you're sharing with and what you're coordinating day to day. A group that just needs to see one schedule wants a different tool than a team trying to offload it to AI.
Choose Google Calendar if you:
Choose Outlook Calendar if you:
Choose Teamup if you:
Choose Calendly if you:
Choose Doodle if you:
Choose Lindy if you:
Choose Motion if you:
Choose Reclaim.ai if you:
Choose Superhuman if you:
Choose Notion Calendar if you:
Choose ClickUp if you:
Choose TimeTree if you:
Choose Cozi if you:
Skip this category entirely if you:
{{cta}}
There's no single best pick, because what you need depends on whether you're just showing a team one schedule or handing the whole thing off to run itself. If everyone's on the same provider and you just need one visible schedule, Google Calendar or Outlook already does it, and Teamup steps in when the group doesn't have accounts.
If the schedule keeps falling apart faster than a person can fix it, the AI tools start to pay for themselves. Lindy is the pick for teams that want to hand off the calendar, inbox, and follow-ups from one text thread. Worth a look if that daily admin is the real drain. Try it on the free trial before you commit to the ramp-up of a heavier system.
For teams that just want sharing to work, the best shareable calendar app is Google Calendar, because it shares a calendar in two clicks with four permission levels. Teams on Microsoft 365 get the same ease from Outlook Calendar, and groups without shared accounts are better served by Teamup.
Google Calendar is the best free shareable calendar app for anyone with a Google account, since it shares a personal calendar at no cost across devices. Teamup also offers a usable free plan that covers up to 5 sub-calendars and 5 users with no account required.
Sharing across Google, Outlook, and iCloud usually means publishing a public link that most calendars support in read-only form. For two-way editing across providers, a link-based tool like Teamup or a scheduling layer like Calendly avoids the sync problems native calendars hit.
Yes, several apps read both at once. Reclaim.ai and Calendly check availability across Google Calendar and Outlook together, and Lindy works with either to schedule and reschedule on your behalf.
Yes, though most tools here lean toward work teams. Google Calendar and Outlook handle personal sharing well, while a group that wants household features like shared lists is better served by an app built for families.
