Make.com Pricing: Plans, Costs, and Is It Worth It in 2026?

Make.com pricing is credit-based and starts at $10.59/month, along with a free tier to try out the tool. I tested it, analyzed each pricing plan, and compared it with alternatives like Zapier and Lindy to help you decide whether Make is worth the cost in 2026.

Make.com pricing plans: At a glance

Make.com pricing scales with usage, so the plan you choose matters more than the features list. Here’s a quick snapshot of each plan, cost, and ideal use case:

Make pricing plans breakdown

Make offers 5 pricing plans, all catering to different needs and users. The pricing also increases as you increase the number of monthly credits. Here’s what each plan offers in detail:

Free plan: $0/month

• What’s included: 1,000 credits/month, AI agents, visual workflow builder, and access to 3,000+ app integrations
• Best for: Individuals testing Make or building low-volume, non-critical automations
• Pros:
  
  • No time limit on the free plan
  • Full access to the workflow builder
  • Good way to learn how the tool consumes credits
• Cons:
  
  • Credits run out fast in multi-step workflows
  • 15-minute minimum run interval limits time-sensitive use

Core plan: $10.59/month, billed monthly

• What’s included: 10,000 credits/month, AI agents, unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute minimum run interval, routers and filters, higher data transfer limits, access to the Make API, webhooks, and HTTP modules
• Best for: Solopreneurs and small teams running simple to moderately complex automations on a predictable schedule
• Pros:
  
  • Removes the scenario limits from the Free plan
  • Supports API calls and real-time triggers via webhooks
  • Low monthly cost for serious automation use
• Cons:
  
  • Can consume 10,000 credits quickly in multi-step or looping workflows
  • No priority execution during high platform usage

Pro plan: $18.82/month, billed monthly

• What’s included: Priority scenario execution, AI agents, custom variables, scenario inputs, full-text execution log search, and everything in the Core plan
• Best for: Growing businesses, agencies, and teams running higher-volume automations that need better reliability and easier debugging
• Pros:
  
  • Priority execution reduces delays during peak usage
  • Full-text logs make troubleshooting faster
  • More control over inputs and variables in complex scenarios
• Cons:
  
  • Same base credit limit as the Core plan, unless you pay extra
  • Costs still scale quickly as workflows grow in size and frequency

Teams plan: $34.12/month, billed monthly

• What’s included: Team roles and permissions, AI agents, shared scenario templates, priority execution, and everything in the Pro plan
• Best for: Small to mid-sized teams collaborating on shared automations across multiple workflows
• Pros:
  
  • Adds basic governance through roles and permissions
  • Makes it easier to reuse and manage scenarios as a team
  • Keeps execution priority from the Pro plan
• Cons:
  
  • Credit limits stay the same despite added users, unless you pay more for higher limits
  • Team features do not reduce usage-based cost spikes

Enterprise plan: Custom pricing

• What’s included: Custom credit volumes, AI agents, SSO and SCIM, audit logs, enterprise app integrations, advanced security controls, overage protection, and 24/7 enterprise support
• Best for: Large organizations running mission-critical automations or operating under strict security and compliance requirements
• Pros:
  
  • Strong security and identity management features
  • Support and tooling designed for high-volume automation
  • Protection against unexpected overage spikes
• Cons:
  
  • No public pricing or clear cost benchmarks
  • Overkill for small teams and lightweight workflows

Which Make.com plan should you choose?

The right Make pricing plan depends on how often your workflows run and how complex they get. Here’s a quick guide to match your use case with the right plan:

Choose the Free plan if you:

• Want to test the tool and understand how it consumes credits
• Run low-volume automations with no real-time or business impact

Choose the Core plan if you:

• Run simple workflows on a daily or hourly schedule
• Need API access or webhooks without paying much upfront

Choose the Pro plan if you:

• Manage higher-volume or client-facing automations
• Need faster execution and better logs to debug failures

Choose the Teams plan if you:

• Collaborate with others on shared scenarios
• Need basic roles and permissions without jumping to Enterprise

Choose the Enterprise plan if you:

• Run mission-critical automations at scale
• Require SSO, audit logs, and stronger security controls

Is Make.com worth the cost?

Make.com is worth the cost if your workflows stay predictable and you understand how it consumes credits. The platform gives you a lot of control, and the pricing looks affordable when your scenarios run on a steady schedule.

However, it can get expensive when usage spikes. Multi-step workflows, loops, and frequent triggers burn through credits faster than most teams expect. Plus, you only get the same 10,000 credits on the base Core, Pro, and Teams plans, unless you choose a higher credit limit. 

Make.com is worth it if you:

• Run predictable, scheduled workflows with known execution volume
• Automate internal ops like data syncing, reporting, or system handoffs
• Monitor credit usage and plan scenarios before scaling them

Skip Make.com if you:

• Experience sudden or unpredictable spikes in workflow volume
• Run lead routing or customer-facing automations with uneven demand
• Want pricing that scales without tracking credits or overages

If you treat automation like infrastructure and track usage, Make makes a lot of sense. But for flexibility without constant credit monitoring, the pricing can feel restrictive as you scale.

‍

{{templates}}

‍

Make.com alternatives: How they compare

If you’re looking for AI automation tools, there are tons of Make alternatives with different pricing models and capabilities. The right one depends on your application and usage volume. Here are the top alternatives side-by-side, along with their ideal use cases:

Lindy vs Make.com: Which tool should you choose?

Make.com suits technical users or tinkerers who want to control every step and condition, and also lets you add AI agents to your workflows. It has a slight learning curve and takes a while to get used to its workflows. 

Lindy, on the other hand, is easy and intuitive to use. It lets you create AI assistants using the drag-and-drop workflow builder or choose from the hundreds of prebuilt templates. These AI assistants can make decisions and act with context. 

Here are a few scenarios to help you decide which one to choose:

Lindy is better for:

• Workflows that need judgment, context, or conversation
• Tasks like email replies, lead follow-ups, scheduling, and phone calls
• Teams that want automation without building every step manually

Make.com is better for:

• Structured, rule-based workflows with clear logic
• Data syncing, internal ops, and predictable automation schedules
• Users who want visual control over every scenario

Use both if:

• You want Make.com to handle data movement and system logic
• You want Lindy to handle decisions, messaging, or customer-facing actions
• You need structure for backend workflows and flexibility on the front end

My bottom line on Make.com pricing

Make works well if you need complete control over structured workflows and don't mind planning for credits in advance. For predictable internal automations like data syncing, scheduled jobs, or backend ops, the pricing makes sense as long as usage stays steady.

That said, I’d personally choose Lindy when workflows involve judgment, conversation, or changing demand. I prefer not predefining every step when automations need to adapt in real time. For tasks like email handling, lead follow-ups, or customer-facing work, that flexibility matters more to me than fine-grained control.

Make works well for users who enjoy building and managing workflows. If you want automation to handle decisions with less setup and fewer pricing surprises, Lindy is easier to live with.

Why Lindy is an ideal Make alternative

Lindy beats Make.com pricing as it offers 4,000+ integrations, hundreds of ready-to-use and customizable templates, phone support, and an AI app builder with its paid plan.

It’s a strong alternative to Zapier and Pabbly as well because Lindy can work across email, phone, and text, and can handle complex business tasks.

Here’s why Lindy is a better Make alternative: 

• Drag-and-drop workflow builder for non-coders: You don’t need any technical skills to build workflows with Lindy. It offers a drag-and-drop visual workflow builder. 
• Text your assistant to run calls: Just tell Lindy what you need in plain English. You can ask it to call new leads, qualify prospects, book meetings, and log outcomes. Lindy can also manage dedicated AI phone numbers for inbound sales calls.  
• Update CRM fields without manual entry: Instead of just logging a transcript, you can set up Lindy to update CRM fields and fill in missing data in Salesforce and HubSpot without manual input​. 
• Send follow-up emails and keep everyone in sync: Lindy can send follow-up emails, schedule meetings, and keep everyone in the loop by triggering notifications in Slack. 
• Lead enrichment: You can configure Lindy to use a prospecting API to research prospects and to provide sales teams with richer insights before outreach. 
• Automated sales outreach: Lindy can run multi-touch email campaigns, follow up on leads, and write follow-up replies using open rates, clicks, and prior messages.
• Supports tasks across different domains: Lindy handles meeting notes, website chat, and content creation. It can also help reduce manual work in training, content, and CRM updates.

Try Lindy’s free trial and automate your first workflow. 

‍

{{cta}}

‍

Frequently asked questions

What is Make.com?

Make.com is a no-code automation platform that connects apps and runs workflows based on rules you define. It lets users build visual scenarios that move data, trigger actions, and process information across thousands of tools. 

Is the free plan enough for real workflows?

No, the free plan is not enough for real workflows and only works for testing and learning. It includes 1,000 credits/month and limits how often scenarios can run. Most real workflows with multiple steps exceed the free limits quickly.

Which one is a better Make alternative, Lindy or Zapier?

Lindy is a better Make alternative as it works as an AI assistant that handles tasks needing context, decisions, or conversation. It’s easy to use for non-technical users, and offers hundreds of templates so you can automate workflows quickly. Zapier works better for simple, linear automations that move data between apps. 

Is Make cheaper long-term?

Make can stay cheaper long-term if workflows run at predictable volumes. Costs rise when scenarios scale in steps, frequency, or data size. Teams that monitor usage closely control costs better than teams with uneven demand.