The Best Workload Management Software I Tested in 2026

Three months into managing a 12-person creative team, I realized our only workload management software was a spreadsheet nobody updated consistently. It was always right about the wrong moment. It would show a designer at 80% on a Tuesday, and by Thursday she had taken on two more briefs nobody had entered yet.

The week it cost us something, the sheet still said she had 20% free. It had not been touched in nine days. We found out on a Friday afternoon when a client deliverable did not ship. That is the failure mode workload management software is supposed to fix. I tested 16 tools across three real teams to find out which ones do. Here is what I found.

What is workload management software?

Workload management software is a tool that helps managers plan, distribute, and track team assignments so no one is overloaded. It uses visual dashboards, capacity planning, and time tracking to keep people from burning out and projects on schedule.

You will see this category marketed under several names:

• Team workload planner
• Capacity planning software
• Workforce planning software
• Resource allocation software

Whatever the label, they all answer the same question: who has room, and who does not.

The distinction that matters is that workload tools track people and their available time. Project management tools track tasks and deadlines. A lot of software claims to do both, but usually does one well and treats the other as an afterthought.

The good ones update automatically as tasks change and account for vacation, part-time schedules, and hours already logged. The weaker ones rely on someone remembering to update a field, which is the same failure mode as a spreadsheet, just with a nicer interface.

How I tested workload management software

The same question comes up constantly on r/projectmanagement or r/agency. How do you catch someone overloaded before they burn out or miss a deadline? Some people swear by dedicated workload tools. Others say their existing PM software already handles it.

To settle that, this list comes from 16 tools run across three real teams: a 5-person creative studio, a 30-person software company, and a 90-person services firm. Each tool had to handle real task reassignments, real time-off requests, and changing workloads. 

I judged every tool against four criteria:

• Overload detection speed: How long between a schedule change and the tool showing someone overloaded. Some tools update the moment a task moves. Others need a manual refresh, which means the dashboard is always a step behind reality.
• Reassignment ease: How many clicks it takes to move a task from an overloaded person to someone with room. A tool that makes this a form to fill out gets used once, then abandoned.
• Schedule accuracy: Whether the tool automatically accounts for holidays, part-time schedules, and approved leave, or whether someone has to remember to enter that manually. This is the single biggest source of stale data across every tool tested.
• Report usability: Whether a manager can turn the workload view into something they'd hand to leadership, or whether it stays a screen only the PM understands.

Overload detection speed broke the tie first. I moved a designer off a project mid-sprint to see how fast each tool noticed. monday updated in seconds. Smartsheet needed a manual refresh. That single difference is the whole ballgame.

The other three came down to friction. Reassignment ease was click count. Schedule accuracy was whether the tool knew about leave and part-time schedules on its own. Report usability was whether a department head could read the export without a PM explaining it. Most failed that last one.

Six didn't make the cut: 

• Productive.io treats workload as a side feature. 
• Mosaic's allocation was solid, but its integrations lag Float's. 
• Teamdeck does the basics, but Resource Guru does the same job with less friction. 
• Scoro and Ganttic are competent, but neither does anything the ten below don't already do better.
• Forecast was mid-acquisition into Accelo during testing; bad timing more than a bad product.

Workload management software at a glance

1. ClickUp: Best for teams with mixed workload units

What it does: ClickUp lets engineering track in story points, marketing in tasks, and design in hours, all inside the same workload view, without forcing any team to convert to a shared unit.

Who it's for: Startups running their entire task list, docs, and sprints inside ClickUp who need workload tracking in the same workspace they never leave.

Key features

• Workload view: Compares each person's work against their capacity using whatever unit your team already tracks in: hours, tasks, or points, with no forced conversion between departments.
• Custom capacity: Sets each person's real weekly availability instead of defaulting everyone to 40 hours. Day-by-day granularity requires the Enterprise plan.
• Box view: Shows who is swamped and who has room in a single glance, without requiring you to filter task lists to get the picture.
• Automations: Fires a notification the moment someone crosses their workload threshold, so more work does not get added on top before anyone notices.
• Native time-off tracking: Subtracts approved leave from capacity automatically, removing the need to cross-check against a separate calendar or HR system.
• Multiple workload metrics: Displays points, tasks, and hours simultaneously inside the same view without forcing you to pick just one.

Why I picked it

Box View is ClickUp's capacity summary screen. It pulls every team member into a single grid, shows how much work they have assigned, and flags anyone sitting over or under their set limit. The point is to give you the full team picture without going through individual task lists.

I set up three fake departments with three different estimating units: story points, task counts, and hours. I expected Box View to force some kind of conversion before it could display them together. It did not. It showed all three side by side, unit differences and all.

If your teams already agree on hours, you will not notice this flexibility is there. But if you have ever sat in a planning meeting where one team talks points and another talks tasks and nobody can compare the two, ClickUp is the only tool here built around that reality.

What could improve

The Workload view has a use-count ceiling on cheaper plans. I hit it mid-quarter with a growing team that had not planned for it. Three departments using different measurement units also creates a downstream problem: a manager eventually has to compare numbers that do not mean the same thing across teams.

Pricing

Free forever includes 60 lifetime uses of Workload view. Unlimited is $10 per user per month, and Business is $19 per user per month.

2. monday.com: Best for teams already on monday.com

What it does: The workload data already lives in your monday.com boards. This tool surfaces it as a per-person capacity view so you do not have to build a second system to see it.

Who it's for: Marketing teams already living inside monday.com boards who want workload visibility without adding another platform to manage.

Key features

• Workload widget: Converts task counts and effort estimates already sitting in your boards into a visual capacity view, with no new data entry required from your team.
• Workload balancing: Lets you drag an overloaded task directly to someone with available room, from the same view that flagged the problem in the first place.
• Resource management (Enterprise): Rolls capacity across every team into one dashboard so you are not checking boards one at a time to piece together the full picture.
• Capacity planning in monday dev: Warns an engineering lead when a sprint is overcommitted before the standup where it would have come up anyway. Requires monday dev.
• AI insights: Flags people approaching overload before a manual scan would catch it.
• Timeline and Gantt views: Places workload bars next to deadlines so you can tell overloaded-but-fine from overloaded-and-late at a glance.

Why I picked it

monday's Workload view is a per-person capacity bar built from tasks that already exist on your boards. When someone's bar turns red, you can drag a task directly off their plate and onto someone else's from that same screen. 

I tested this mid-sprint by pulling a task from one person's board onto someone else's. Every other board that referenced that task updated within a few seconds, with no manual refresh needed. That is what earned monday.com its spot on this list. If your tasks already live here, you are turning on a view for data you already have.

The capacity view is only as honest as your team's estimating habits, though. Skip logging effort estimates for a few weeks, and the bars stop reflecting reality, quietly, until the numbers are wrong in front of a client.

What could improve

Cross-board visibility is not included at the entry tier despite what the marketing page implies. It requires Pro. Enterprise Resource Management is also priced separately from the main plans.

Pricing

monday.com comes with a Free Forever plan. Paid plans start from Basic at $12 per seat per month, Standard at $14 per seat per month, and Pro at $24 per seat per month. All three plans require a minimum of 3 seats.

3. Wrike: Best for cross-functional teams sharing people

What it does: Wrike surfaces scheduling collisions between departments before they become missed deadlines, specifically for organizations where multiple teams share the same pool of people.

Who it's for: Cross-functional teams at 50-plus-person companies where marketing, ops, and creative pull from the same request queue and routinely step on each other's timelines.

Key features

• Workload charts: Visually flags anyone over or under capacity the moment it happens, without waiting for them to raise the issue themselves in a meeting.
• Resource planning: Balances workload across teams from one view so an idle team and an overloaded one do not stay invisible to each other across the organization.
• Resource booking: Locks in who is assigned to a project next month before the task breakdown is even finished, preventing last-minute scrambles for coverage.
• Time tracking: Compares logged hours against planned hours, useful for identifying teams or project types that consistently underestimate the work involved.
• Cross tagging: Places the same person's hours inside two client folders at once without creating duplicate entries or double-counting their time.
• Budgeting and financial planning: Ties staffing cost to project budget. Available on Pinnacle and Apex plans.

Why I picked it

Wrike's workload chart sits above the task level. It tracks every person's active assignments across all projects in the system and flags the moment anyone crosses their available hours. When two teams book the same person without knowing it, the chart catches the overlap before it becomes a missed deadline.

I double-booked a senior designer across two client projects on purpose, the exact mistake this tool is supposed to catch. The workload chart flagged the conflict as soon as I saved the second booking. I did not have to go looking for it.

That specific catch is worth paying for once it happens weekly at your company. Most teams that land on Wrike are past the point where "wait, isn't Sarah already on the Q3 launch?" is a rare surprise.

What could improve

The 5-user minimum on Business quietly raises the effective per-seat rate for smaller teams. Margin visibility is not in Business either. It requires Pinnacle, which is easy to miss when reading the pricing page.

Pricing

Free covers basic task management. The Team plan is $10 per user per month. Business is $25 with a 5-user minimum. Pinnacle and Apex are custom.

4. Smartsheet: Best for spreadsheet-native project teams

What it does: Smartsheet bolts workload tracking onto grid-and-Gantt project planning so teams that have run projects in spreadsheets for years do not need to change how they think about work.

Who it's for: Construction and IT project offices that plan in grids and Gantt charts and have no intention of switching to a kanban-style interface.

Key features

• Workload tracking: Flags overallocated people inside the same grid format your team already uses for project plans, without requiring anyone to learn a new interface first.
• Control center: Standardizes templates and permissions so every new project starts from the same setup, regardless of who creates it.
• Resource management: Forecasts capacity across multiple projects. Sold as a separate paid add-on rather than included in the base subscription price.
• Baselines and variance reports: Compares planned staffing against actual, catching patterns of understaffing before they compound into bigger schedule problems.
• Automated workflows: Triggers an alert when a workload condition changes, assuming the sheet has been opened recently enough for it to process the update.
• Multiple project views: Supports grid, Gantt, card, calendar, and timeline formats so each stakeholder sees the view they prefer.

Why I picked it

Smartsheet's workload tracking lives inside the same grid you already use for task plans. Each row still represents a task, but once you assign effort values, Smartsheet sums them up per person and shows a capacity indicator above the sheet. The indicator does not refresh on its own. It updates when someone opens or manually refreshes the sheet.

I left a workload sheet untouched for six days, the way a busy project manager would. Nothing flagged the drift on its own. I had to manually refresh before the sheet caught up to reality.

That test did not disqualify Smartsheet. It confirmed what kind of tool it is. If your team already rejected one kanban rollout and you need workload layered onto something familiar, the manual refresh is a known trade-off. Coming to this category fresh and expecting real-time accuracy is a different situation entirely.

What could improve

Capacity forecasting is locked behind a separate paid add-on that the base price does not mention upfront. There is also no free tier for building a real project, so testing before buying is not really an option.

Pricing

Pro is $12 per user per month for up to 10 users. Business is $24 per user per month, with a 3-user minimum. Enterprise and Advanced Work Management are custom.

5. Asana: Best for portfolio managers tracking goals

What it does: Asana puts capacity data and company goals side by side so a manager can see whether an overload is tied to a real priority or work that just landed on someone's plate without any strategic backing.

Who it's for: Ops managers tracking several project portfolios at once who need workload rolled up against company-wide goals, beyond a single team's task list.

Key features

• Portfolio workload: Rolls every project's capacity into one view instead of requiring you to open separate tabs per team and piece the picture together manually.
• Goals integration: Ties capacity directly to company goals, catching overload on work that has no stated priority attached to it at all.
• Effort-based planning: Measures workload in hours, points, or a custom field with no forced unit, depending on what your teams already track.
• Rules and automations: Reassigns or flags overload automatically once a threshold is set, without requiring a human to catch the trigger and act on it.
• Native time tracking: Flags where estimates consistently run off against logged actuals, useful for improving how future projects get planned.
• Timeline and calendar views: Show whether an overload lands during a quiet week or the day before a major launch, which changes how urgent the fix is.

Why I picked it

Portfolio Workload is Asana's cross-project capacity view. It pulls every active task with its assigned effort value into a single person-by-person bar chart, showing how full someone's plate is across every project they are on. The Goals layer sits alongside it, flagging which projects are tied to company priorities and which have no priority attached at all.

An ops manager at a 50-person company buried a genuine urgent client fix inside a project with no goal attached. Portfolio Workload showed the same red flag it showed for low-priority busywork. She had to open Goals separately to tell the difference.

Every other tool in this list would have done the same thing. Asana at least gives you a second layer to check. That is the real argument for it over Wrike or Smartsheet. Those tools tell you who is overloaded. Asana gives you a place to ask whether the work causing the overload is worth solving at all.

What could improve

Portfolio Workload is not included in the Starter plan. A company-wide view requires Enterprise. The real cost tends to show up later than the pricing page suggests.

Pricing

Personal is free for up to 2 users. Starter is $13.49 per user per month. Advanced is $30.49 per user per month and includes Portfolio Workload. 

6. Float: Best for agencies billing by the hour

What it does: Float adds a profit-and-loss layer underneath the scheduling calendar so every booking also shows up as margin math, making a staffing mistake visible as a cost problem before it becomes a deadline problem.

Who it's for: Agencies billing by the hour that need to know whether putting a specific person on a project makes financial sense, beyond whether they are simply available.

Key features

• Drag-and-drop scheduling: Reassigns work across dates or people in one motion with no forms required afterward, making rescheduling fast enough that it gets done.
• Capacity forecasting: Shows who is overbooked in real time the moment a schedule change is saved, without requiring a manual refresh to see the updated numbers.
• Time tracking (Pro): Compares scheduled hours to logged hours, catching work that consistently gets underestimated on specific clients or project types.
• Resource filtering: Filters available people by role, skill, or tag faster than scanning through everyone's schedule by hand looking for gaps.
• Project finance (Pro): Tracks cost and margin alongside the schedule so profitability is visible from the same view as availability.
• Project placeholders: Reserves a scheduling slot before you know who fills it. Starter allows only one placeholder at a time.

Why I picked it

Float's capacity forecast is a live bar for every scheduled person. As you drag bookings around the calendar, the bars update in real time. When a bar goes red, that person is overbooked. The forecast does not block you from creating the conflict. It flags it after the booking saves.

I created an obviously impossible schedule: a 12-hour booking for one freelancer in a single day. Float did not block the save. The capacity forecast flagged it red a few seconds afterward instead.

That is still a fast catch. But the behavior matters for how you use the tool. Float assumes you will check the forecast view after scheduling rather than stopping you before you commit. Agencies that live in the forecast view will not notice the difference. Teams that schedule first and check later might.

What could improve

Float bills per scheduled person rather than per login. A studio with five staff and fifteen rotating freelancers quietly ends up paying for a twenty-person team. The single placeholder on Starter also runs out fast for anyone juggling more than one pipeline deal at a time.

Pricing

Starter is $8.50 per user per month. Pro is $14 per user per month. Enterprise is custom. All prices are per scheduled person.

‍

{{templates}}

‍

7. Resource Guru: Best for stopping double-bookings fast

What it does: Resource Guru is a shared scheduling calendar with built-in clash detection and leave tracking. It solves the double-booking problem and nothing else, which is exactly right for a specific kind of team.

Who it's for: Small agencies that already manage projects in a separate tool and need one calendar to catch scheduling conflicts and keep leave in the same view as project work.

Key features

• Clash management: Blocks a double-booking before it saves, sending a tentative request to a waiting list rather than quietly overwriting someone's availability.
• Leave tracking: Puts approved vacation inside the same calendar as project work so there is no separate HR system to cross-reference before scheduling someone.
• Resource booking: Schedules people, meeting rooms, and equipment from a single calendar view without requiring separate systems for each resource type.
• Utilization reports: Surfaces people who have been sitting well under capacity for weeks, the kind of gap a busy manager rarely catches by scanning schedules manually. Blackbelt and Master plans only.
• Quick log timesheets: Provides a rough accuracy check without requiring detailed time-tracking forms that eat into the end of every week.
• Booking approvals and SSO: Adds an approval workflow and centralized login management. Master plan only.

Why I picked it

Resource Guru's clash detection works at the moment of booking. Every resource, whether a person, a room, or a piece of equipment, has a single availability line. When you try to schedule two things into the same slot, the system catches it before the booking saves. Confirmed bookings go through. Conflicting ones go to a waiting list instead.

I tried to book the same conference room and the same designer for two overlapping client calls at the same time. The room booking failed outright. The designer request went to a waiting list instead of going through silently. Both catches happened automatically, with no manual review on my part.

That is the product in a single test. You don’t get goal tracking, margin math, or scenario planning. What you get is a calendar that will not let you accidentally overbook two things at once. For a 10-person agency that already manages projects somewhere else, that is often the only thing missing.

What could improve

Utilization reporting, the feature that tells you someone has been idle for three weeks, is not available on the entry plan. Pricing also scales flat per person, so a 40-person team pays the same rate as a 10-person one.

Pricing

Grasshopper is $6 per user per month. Blackbelt is $9.60 per user per month, and Master is $14.40 per user per month. All plans include a 30-day free trial.

8. Runn: Best for pre-sales capacity planning

What it does: Runn starts capacity planning at the pitch stage, letting firms model what a not-yet-signed project would do to their team before any contract exists.

Who it's for: Professional services firms bidding on new client work who need to understand staffing and hiring implications before a deal closes, rather than scrambling to staff it afterward.

Key features

• Scenario planning: Models what an unsigned project would do to your team's workload before you commit to a timeline, letting you spot problems while the proposal still has room to change.
• Capacity planning: Filters availability by person, role, or skill rather than just showing general headroom across the whole team.
• Financial forecasting: Tracks budget and margin next to the resourcing plan from the start of a project, not just once delivery is underway.
• Timesheets and variance reports: Flags recurring underquoting on delivery time before it becomes a pattern, using actuals to sharpen future estimates.
• Reporting dashboards: Rolls pre-sale through delivery into one view instead of requiring three separate manual reports to get the full picture.
• Integrations: Connects to BambooHR, Workday, and Clockify so leave data stays current between systems without manual updates.

Why I picked it

Runn's scenario planning lets you model a project before it is confirmed. You create a hypothetical engagement, assign roles, and set a timeline. The system maps it against your team's existing commitments and shows exactly which people would go over capacity and by how much, without touching any live project data.

A firm modeled a client project that had not yet closed. They expected a general capacity warning back. Runn named the two specific engineers who would go over capacity if the deal landed on the proposed timeline. That level of specificity changed how they scoped the proposal before it went out the door.

Float would have had nothing to schedule yet. Resource Guru would have had nothing to block. The difference is in when Runn becomes useful. It earns its place before the contract, while the decision still has room to move.

What could improve

Runn is newer than Float or Resource Guru, and a buying committee that wants a long customer track record will find less to point to.

Pricing

Free for up to 5 managed resources. Lite is $9 per resource per month, and Standard is $13 per resource per month, adding timesheets, integrations, API access, and custom fields. Advanced is custom.

9. Resource Flow by Milient: Best for modular, pay-what-you-use pricing

What it does: Resource Flow unbundles resource scheduling into separate modules so you only pay for the pieces, like timesheets or booking approvals, that your team will use.

Who it's for: Dedicated resource managers at professional services firms who want to build a cost model around their specific feature needs rather than pay for a flat bundle that includes things they will never touch.

Key features

• Drag-and-drop scheduling: Flags an overbooked person the moment you try to add more work to their plate, before the booking is committed to the calendar.
• Premium extensions: Adds timesheets or task management only when you choose to, without buying the full bundle upfront to access one feature.
• Heat map reports: Spots overallocation across departments in seconds rather than requiring you to read through individual schedule rows to find the gap.
• Skills and location matching: Filters available people by skill or location so staffing means qualified and available, not just unbooked.
• Leave management: Puts approved vacation inside the schedule rather than requiring a manual cross-check against a separate HR or calendar system.
• Parked resources: Keeps a contractor's scheduling history without charging for their seat once they go inactive on a project.

Why I picked it

Resource Flow separates its features into distinct modules like scheduling, timesheets, task management, and approval workflows. You choose which ones to activate and pay only for those. The base plan covers scheduling and capacity. Each additional module adds to the monthly bill rather than being bundled in by default.

I priced out only the modules a 20-person services team would realistically turn on and skipped the extensions they would not use, then compared that total against Float's flat rate for the same headcount. Resource Flow came out cheaper on that specific configuration. When I added timesheets and approval workflows back in, the math tipped the other way.

That calculation is the entire buying decision for Resource Flow. Do it before signing. If you would rather have one predictable bill and not think about modules, this tool will frustrate you.

What could improve

Timesheets and approval workflows, the features a larger resourcing team needs day-to-day, sit behind add-ons or the Premium tier. The sticker price undersells the real cost of a complete setup. Every contractor or piece of equipment also adds to the per-resource bill.

Pricing

Plug & Play starts at $7 per resource per month. Premium starts at $18 per resource per month. Business Leader costs $54 per resource per month. Project Flow and Knowledge Flow are custom.

10. Kantata: Best for enterprise consulting firms

What it does: Kantata runs every staffing decision through cost and margin before it gets to availability, making it resource management built for firms that already treat resourcing as a financial call.

Who it's for: Consultancies with 50-plus billable staff that need staffing, delivery timelines, and revenue forecasts pulling from the same set of numbers in the same system.

Key features

• Financial-driven resource planning: Matches people to projects by skill, availability, and cost together rather than treating availability as the only filter in the staffing decision.
• Capacity forecasting: Compares future capacity against the sales pipeline so a staffing shortfall shows up before a deal closes and creates a delivery problem.
• Project accounting: Keeps cost, billing, and profitability in the same system as the resourcing plan, so there is no reconciliation step between two separate tools.
• Business intelligence dashboards: Shows utilization and financial health across the whole organization in a format built for leadership review, readable without a PM to explain it.
• Kantata OX and SX: Available as standalone or Salesforce-native, so Salesforce shops do not need a second system sitting outside their CRM.
• Enterprise reporting: Rolls staffing and margin across every practice group into one view instead of waiting on someone to stitch spreadsheets together before a leadership meeting.

Why I picked it

Kantata's financially driven resource planning adds a cost layer to every staffing decision. When you assign someone to a project, the system calculates the cost of that assignment against the project budget and checks whether the margin holds. It also flags if that person's time would be better spent on a higher-margin project running in parallel.

I went in expecting the margin check to work like a spreadsheet formula: flag the number and stop there. A project that looked profitable on paper would have pulled two senior consultants off higher-margin work to staff it. Kantata surfaced that trade-off directly instead of leaving the math for someone to calculate by hand.

That is the version of workload visibility that justifies Kantata's price. The question shifts from "is someone available" to "should we use them here given what it costs and what else they could be doing." Below 50 billable staff, that question rarely needs its own system. Past it, Kantata earns its place.

What could improve

The implementation timeline is the real cost to plan for. Months of implementation and data migration mean this will not fix a workload problem you are having this quarter. A 50-seat minimum is reported for most new customers, so a 20-person firm evaluating this is looking at something sized for twice its headcount.

Pricing

Kantata is custom priced, sold through annual enterprise contracts. Contact their sales team for a quote. A 50-seat minimum applies in most cases.

How to choose workload management software

The right pick comes down to three things: where your tasks already live, whether workload needs to connect to money, and how fast your headcount is growing.

Before committing to anything, run through these questions:

• Does your team already live in a project management tool? If yes, start with monday.com, ClickUp, or Asana before buying something separate.
• Do you need workload tied to profitability? Agencies billing by the hour should look at Float, Runn, or Kantata. Internal capacity planning teams can skip that layer entirely.
• Will you outgrow the per-seat pricing? Float, Resource Guru, Runn, and Resource Flow all scale per person. Check for volume discounts before you are 40 people in and locked into a rate that no longer makes sense.
• How much financial depth do you need? A 12-person studio does not need Kantata. A 400-person firm will outgrow Float. Match the tool to your actual size, not to whatever dazzled you in the demo.

‍

{{cta}}

‍

Try Lindy for smarter workload management 

Knowing who is overloaded is only half the job. When a task moves, the new owner needs context, the client may need an update, and the project record needs to change. That coordination usually falls through the cracks.

Text Lindy to handle it. Lindy drafts the reassignment message, updates your CRM, and flags anyone else who needs to know, across hundreds of apps including Asana, ClickUp, monday.com, Slack, and Gmail.

Here’s what that looks like in practice:

• Get answers instantly: Text Lindy to pull information from your email, calendar, or CRM without digging through tabs.
• Send emails and follow-ups automatically: Ask Lindy to draft, personalize, and send outreach and handle replies.
• Take meeting notes and share summaries: Lindy joins meetings, writes structured notes, and follows up afterward.
• Update your CRM without manual entry: After a call, Lindy logs notes and automatically fills in missing fields.
• Find and qualify leads in minutes: Tell Lindy your ideal customer profile and get a list of matched leads ready to contact.
• Hundreds of app integrations: Lindy connects with the tools you already use, so everything stays in sync.

Try Lindy free. 

FAQs

What is the best workload management software?

The best workload management software depends on your team's setup. Float and Resource Guru are the strongest standalone picks for agencies, while monday.com and Asana suit teams who'd rather build workload tracking into a tool they already use every day.

Is there a free workload management tool?

Yes. There is a free workload management tool. Runn doesn't charge anything for teams of five or fewer managed people, and both ClickUp and monday.com let you start free too, though the deeper capacity tools on those two only unlock once you pay.

What's the difference between workload management and project management software?

The difference between workload management and project management software comes down to what each one tracks. One tracks the work itself, deadlines, and deliverables. The other tracks the people doing that work, and whether their plate is already full before you hand them anything new.

Do small teams need dedicated workload management software?

No. Small teams don't always need dedicated workload management software. A team of five running one project is usually fine with a shared calendar. Once you're juggling several projects at once, a tool like Resource Guru or Float starts earning its monthly fee fast.

How much does workload management software cost?

Workload management software runs from around $5 per person per month for simple scheduling tools. Full work platforms with workload built in sit in the middle. Big services platforms like Kantata use custom sales quotes.