Google announced Gemini 4 Argon on September 30 and spent two weeks testing it with cyber defenders, early-access customers, and its own teams. On October 13, it opened Argon to anyone on an eligible paid plan.
Argon is now in the Gemini API for paid developers, in the Gemini app and AI Mode for Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers, and in Antigravity for Ultra. Free accounts can't use it yet, and the launch API price of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens doubles on December 1.
I went through both of Google's launch posts, the Gemini API docs and model card, the Gemini app release notes, and Artificial Analysis's independent scores, all on October 14.
I wanted to know which plan gets you in, what you'll pay once the launch price ends, and how much of the benchmark hype holds up when someone outside Google runs the tests.
TL;DR:
Gemini 4 Argon is Google DeepMind's newest frontier AI model, announced on September 30, 2026, released to paying users on October 13, and designed for long, multi-step work.
Google's September 30 announcement says it "delivers frontier performance" in software engineering, enterprise knowledge work, and cybersecurity defense.
Argon's headline spec is a 1-million-token window that input, thinking, and output all share. A single response can run up to 1 million tokens minus whatever you sent in, up from the 64K-token output limit on Google's earlier models.
The bigger limit helps on jobs where the model has to think for a long time or produce a lot of code in one pass, like migrating a whole library to a new language. (Artificial Analysis puts 1 million tokens at about 1,500 pages, which is a lot of Rust.)
In the API, responses stop at 65,536 tokens by default, and Google's developer guide says to run anything longer as a background job.
The specs, from Google's API model page and the Argon model card:
Yes, for now. Argon is the first and only Gemini 4 model so far, so "Gemini 4" and "Gemini 4 Argon" point to the same thing.
That probably won't last. Google's Logan Kilpatrick called the launch "just the start of the Gemini 4 era" in his announcement on X, so expect more Gemini 4 models.
In Google's current lineup, Argon sits above Gemini 3.1 Pro (still in preview) and Gemini 3.8 Flash.
As of October 14, 2026, Gemini 4 Argon is open to paid Gemini API developers, Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers, Gemini for business customers, and GitHub Copilot Pro+, Max, Business, and Enterprise users. Free Gemini accounts, Google AI Plus, and the free API tier don't have it.
Here's where it shows up and who gets in:
Argon is "rolling out globally for Google AI Pro & Ultra subscribers in the Gemini app," according to Google's Gemini release notes, and both tiers also get it in AI Mode in Search.
Google AI Pro costs $19.99 a month, and Ultra costs $99.99 (5x Pro's usage) or $199.99 (20x), per Google's plans page. If you only want Argon in the app, Pro is the cheapest way in.
Google hasn't published Argon-specific limits. Its usage limits page says Gemini app limits are compute-based and refresh every five hours until you hit a weekly cap.
Free accounts and Google AI Plus ($4.99 a month) don't get Argon.
Argon is generally available in the Gemini API as gemini-4-argon, according to Google's API changelog. Google's October 13 post says you can build with it on the paid tier in Google AI Studio and Android Studio.
It isn't on the free API tier or included with Google AI Pro, so Pro subscribers need billing turned on. Google AI Ultra subscribers can also try it in AI Studio, per Google's AI plans page.
Google AI Ultra subscribers can use Argon in Google Antigravity, Google's agentic coding platform, and so can eligible Gemini Enterprise customers.
Google says Argon in Antigravity has helped its own teams raise agentic code submissions by more than 35% while cutting code rollbacks by nearly a third.
Google is also offering 10,000 scientists Antigravity's highest usage tier free for six months, with applications open through its October 13 post.
Argon is generally available in GitHub Copilot for Pro+, Max, Business, and Enterprise users, according to GitHub's changelog. Pick it from the model picker in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Copilot CLI, and other supported editors.
GitHub bills it at Google's list price under usage-based billing, and Business and Enterprise admins can switch it off in Copilot's model policy.
Separately, companies on Gemini for business get Argon too, according to Google's October 13 post.
Cyber defenders can apply to Google DeepMind's Fairwind Program for a version of Argon without the usual cyber guardrails. Google says the program is expanding to hundreds more partners.
Defenders got a two-week head start because Argon is good at finding and patching security flaws, so the people protecting hospitals and power grids could patch their systems before attackers got the same capability.
Here's how to start, depending on where you work:
If you're moving API code from an earlier Gemini model, Google's developer guide lists a few changes:
Gemini 4 Argon was announced on September 30, 2026, and became generally available on October 13, 2026. Here's the timeline so far:
Google hasn't given a date for free Gemini users.
Gemini 4 Argon costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens through November 30, 2026. From December 1, every token rate doubles, to $4 and $20, according to Google's API pricing page.
Output pricing includes thinking tokens, and cached input gets 95% off at both prices.
A few things to know before you budget:
Say your app sends 1,000 requests, each with 5,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens. Through November, that's $10 for input plus $20 for output, so $30 total. From December 1, the same job costs $60.
Now say 4,500 of those 5,000 input tokens are the same system prompt every time, and they hit Google's cache. Your input cost drops from $10 to about $1.45, and the job comes in at about $21.50 (about $43 from December).
How Argon's per-token price compares to its rivals, from each vendor's own pricing page:
That table assumes short prompts. Argon and Opus 5.5 charge the same rate all the way to 1 million tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra charge 2x for input and 1.5x for output once a prompt passes 272K tokens, according to OpenAI's model docs.
Through November, that makes Argon cheaper than Sol on long-document jobs.
So Argon launches at the same price as GPT-6.1 Sol, and from December it matches Claude Opus 5.5. Either way, it costs less than half what GPT-6 Astra does per token.
A model that spends more tokens per task can end up costing more than a cheaper-looking rival, and Artificial Analysis puts Argon at $1.99 per task on its index at the launch price. Test your own workload before you trust any table (this one included).
Google built Gemini 4 Argon for three kinds of work: long coding projects, enterprise knowledge work, and cyber defense. Google backs the coding claims with its own projects, the knowledge-work claims with benchmark wins, and the cyber claims with an early find from Wiz.
Argon's headline example is large codebase migrations. Google says Argon agents are moving C and C++ code to Rust across the company, from tens of thousands of lines in libraries like re2 and libgav1 up to more than 800,000 lines for the Fuchsia Zircon kernel.
The most concrete example is libgav1, Google's open-source video decoder, which already had a Rust port.
Argon agents replaced 32,000 lines of SIMD code with safe Rust the compiler could optimize on its own. The result is a memory-safe decoder that runs 2.7 times faster than the earlier Rust port, with identical video output.
Google is careful here: these rewrites go through automated and manual audits before they reach production.
Google also says Argon agents found memory optimizations across its data centers that free up more than 300 TiB once rolled out (with an estimated 500 TiB to 1 PiB in total savings), and that Argon helped quantum researchers beat a published baseline by 40% in minutes.
If you want to compare it against the coding tools you already use, our roundup of AI coding agents covers the options worth testing.
Argon tops the Vals Index, a benchmark that scores finance, coding, legal, and tax work and weights each field by its share of U.S. GDP. It also leads Vals Finance Agent v2 for financial research and Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark for legal drafting.
Harvey, the legal AI company, says it saw "substantial improvements over Gemini 3.1 Pro" across its legal agent evaluations, according to Google's Cloud launch post.
On AutomationBench, Zapier's benchmark for running business tasks end to end, Google says Argon ranks first at 51.3%. It's also strong when the work involves visuals, with a 91.7% score on LVBench, a test of understanding long videos.
Argon can find, confirm, and patch serious software vulnerabilities on its own.
Wiz, the cloud security company, used Argon through its Scan for Good program, and Google says the model found a critical flaw in healthcare software used by hospitals worldwide that earlier frontier models had missed.
On CWE-bench v1, which tests whether a model can fix security flaws, Argon ties for first place at 68% with GPT-6 Astra and Grok 4.7, according to Google DeepMind's charts.
Google's October 13 post adds science and robotics to the list. It says Argon scores 87% on ERQA, an embodied reasoning benchmark for robots, ahead of every other frontier model.
In an internal Google test, Argon watched a video of a person playing cornhole and wrote simulation code to copy it, and Apptronik's Apollo humanoid then sank seven shots in a row in a real-world trial.
In private evals from Gamow Labs, built from real clinical and lab data, Argon scored 57% on RareBench (rare-disease diagnosis help) and 52.2% on Gamow's LabBench (wet-lab reasoning), a different test from the LABBench 2 in Google's main table.
Gemini 4 Argon leads or ties for the lead on 14 of the 19 results in Google's benchmark table, against GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable 5.1, and Claude Opus 5.5.
These are the numbers Google chose to publish, with Argon at its highest thinking setting according to Google's methodology notes, so read them as the vendor's best case.
The full table on the Google DeepMind Gemini page adds Vibe Code Bench, RiemannBench, a shorter GraphWalks run, Agent's Last Exam, and Chartography, and Argon leads all five.
Here's how I'd read it:
{{templates}}
Artificial Analysis scores Gemini 4 Argon at 53 on its Intelligence Index, which ties it with GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 and ranks it eighth of 216 models on its Argon model page. Google's own table makes Argon look further ahead than that.
Claude Opus 5.5 (at max effort) sits on top at 58, with Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Meta's new Muse Wonder Full at 56, according to the Artificial Analysis leaderboard on October 14. GPT-6.1 Sol is one point behind Argon at 52.
If you're choosing between the two Claude models at the top of that list, our Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5 comparison breaks down the cost per task.
The gap comes down to two differences in how Google and Artificial Analysis tested:
Both also tested Argon at high, its top thinking level, so the settings match.
So both can be right. Argon looks like a top-tier model with standout legal, finance, and long-document results, and it's roughly even with Astra on general intelligence.
We compare the two head-to-head in Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra, and our GPT-6 explainer covers Astra on its own.
Developer and YouTuber Theo Browne, who had early access, had a mixed first take. He called Argon a huge jump for Gemini and good value for the price, and said it's the first model to ace his private SkateBench test.
In the same post, he said it still does strange things often enough that he doesn't trust it yet. That matches the benchmark picture: a big step up for Google, with real gaps on long agent runs.
Google says capabilities at Argon's level need "a phased approach," and its cyber skills are the clearest reason why, since a model that can find and patch serious security flaws can also help someone exploit them.
Google is also taking part in the U.S. government's voluntary process for early model access, and CNBC reported that Sundar Pichai signed a voluntary AI safety agreement at the White House the day before Google announced Argon on September 30.
Before the wide release, Google says it strengthened four safeguards:
If you plan to point Argon at email, documents, or web pages, watch the prompt injection results closely, since those are the places hidden instructions get planted.
{{cta}}
Gemini 4 Argon is live, so you can find out within a day whether it beats what you use now.
If Argon only wins on the legal and long-document jobs, route those to it and leave the rest where they are.
If you'd rather not manage model choice yourself, Lindy, an AI teammate that works in Slack, picks a model for each task and also lets you choose one yourself, with OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini models in the mix.
Yes. Gemini 4 Argon became generally available on October 13, 2026, for paid Gemini API developers, Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers in the Gemini app and AI Mode, Ultra subscribers in Google Antigravity, Gemini for business customers, and GitHub Copilot Pro+, Max, Business, and Enterprise users.
Free Gemini accounts don't have it yet.
Gemini 4 Argon was announced on September 30, 2026, and released on October 13, 2026. Google hasn't given a date for free Gemini users, and its introductory API price runs through November 30, 2026.
Yes. Google AI Pro ($19.99 a month) and Ultra subscribers can use Gemini 4 Argon in the Gemini app and AI Mode in Search. Argon in Antigravity needs Ultra or an eligible Gemini Enterprise subscription, and Google AI Plus subscribers don't get Argon.
No, Gemini 4 Argon requires a paid plan. It isn't on the free Gemini API tier or in the free Gemini app. The cheapest way in is Google AI Pro at $19.99 a month, or pay-as-you-go API billing.
Gemini 4 Argon costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens through November 30, 2026, with cached input at $0.10. From December 1, the price doubles to $4 and $20, per Google's API pricing page.
Gemini 4 Argon beats GPT-6 Astra on most of Google's benchmarks, including DeepSWE v1.1, Vals Finance Agent v2, and Harvey's legal test.
They tie at 53 on Artificial Analysis's independent index. In Google's own table, Astra wins FrontierSWE v2, Terminal-bench 4.0, Terminal-Bench Science, and OSWorld-2.0.
Gemini 4 Argon beats Claude Opus 5.5 on most rows of Google's table, like DeepSWE v1.1 (77.9% vs 74.2%). Opus 5.5 wins FrontierSWE v2, Terminal-bench 4.0, PostTrainBench, and Terminal-Bench Science, and it scores higher on Artificial Analysis's independent index (58 vs 53).
The Fairwind Program is Google DeepMind's early-access program for cyber defenders, such as governments, critical infrastructure operators, and core technology platforms. Its partners get Gemini 4 Argon with its full cyber defense capabilities and without the usual cyber guardrails.
Members must use strong security controls, and only internal security teams can use the model. Google says it's expanding the program to hundreds more partners.
Gemini 4 Argon handles long, complex work like code migrations, financial research, legal drafting, and finding security flaws. A single response can run up to about 1 million tokens.
Inside Google, it's already running large Rust migrations and has found data center memory optimizations that free up more than 300 TiB once rolled out.
